Star Trek Online

Star Trek Online (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/index.php)
-   Federation Shipyards (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/forumdisplay.php?f=218)
-   -   Will they do an Refit of Dreadnought Cruiser?? (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=362271)

roguestarship 08-22-2012 09:53 AM

Will they do an Refit of Dreadnought Cruiser??
 
I mean adding Saucer Seperation as well as Cloak!!

kimmera 08-22-2012 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roguestarship (Post 5394191)
I mean adding Saucer Seperation as well as Cloak!!

Battle cloak not likely. Saucer separation they have talked about a few times I think.

travelingmaster 08-22-2012 10:46 AM

No, you silly Feddies don't need cloaking devices. Besides, most of ya'll wouldn't appreciate the value of a cloaking device anyways :P

palpha3clearance 08-22-2012 10:54 AM

Where is that saucer seperation we were promised by Al Rivera??? The cloaking device comes standard still as far as I know. Enhaced battle cloak would be nice....for a battleship.

goedzooi 08-22-2012 10:57 AM

I hope they stop making endless refits.

teleon22 08-22-2012 11:00 AM

If they were to do a refit of the Dreadnaught I?d really only like to see four simple changes to the ship to make it worthwhile for me to purchase it.

1. Remove the Cloaking Device console and make it a ship specific ability like the Phaser Lance
2. Add the Saucer Separation ability. (Saucer Separation disables the Phaser Lance)
3. Make the Lieutenant Science Slot a universal Lieutenant Slot.
4. Add another Science Console upgrade slot.

targpetz101 08-22-2012 12:53 PM

https://twitter.com/CaptainGeko/stat...916160/photo/1

frostysly 08-22-2012 03:38 PM

1. Thing: The Galaxy X doesn't need a universal Lt. BO Slot. It needs the same setting as the Regent Class. Whats the point in allowing a Cruiser to use Heavy Cannons with only one Rapid Fire abillity? Further it doesn't need a 3rd Sci Console. If either - then a Tac or Engi...

2. The Saucer Seperation is complete as we can see in the twitter pics. According to what I have read on the Forums, the reason it isnt live is because it was supposed to be in a Galaxy Ship-Pack, wich caused problems to people who already had either ship (Galaxy X and Galaxy Retrofit)...

3. The Ship needs a visual Overhaul! Ever noticed that the Bridge, and the Phaserlance is asynchron to the center of the saucer?

4. For all you Klingons out there... :-) The Galaxy X Dreadnought Cruiser doesn't need a Battlecloak. The only reason Klingons use/need a cloak is that they are ashamed of thier ships. Thats why the hide them... XD (Not to be meant rude)

Sorry for my bad english.

stodatapiocard 08-22-2012 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travelingmaster (Post 5394961)
No, you silly Feddies don't need cloaking devices. Besides, most of ya'll wouldn't appreciate the value of a cloaking device anyways :P

I find it cowardly for a klingon to have a cloaking devise! allways hidding! cowardly klingon micro brains! :D

wotertool 08-22-2012 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stodatapiocard (Post 5400191)
I find it cowardly for a klingon to have a cloaking devise! allways hidding! cowardly klingon micro brains! :D

The Romulans were so friendly to give us the cloak for ****ty D7 Cruisers :D

Back to the topic,
If the Galaxy X gets a Refit I think I'm going to buy it. Atm I fly an Assualt Cruiser and I think I will buy the Regent for Dilithm (Dilithium Exchange). But I would throw it away for a Gal-R Refit!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:40 PM.