Star Trek Online

Star Trek Online (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/index.php)
-   Federation Shipyards (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/forumdisplay.php?f=218)
-   -   Warship Voyager Tatical Intrepid Class (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=544651)

rattraps123 02-08-2013 10:56 AM

Warship Voyager Tatical Intrepid Class
 
We need a tatical heavy Intrepid class starship


3 tatical bridge officer statons, 1 engineering station, 1 science station.
4 tatical consoles, 2 engineering consoles, 2 science consoles.
4 weapons forward, 3 aft


http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warship_Voyager

It shoudl be easy to put into the game. almost all models are made already - Rattraps123

Please leave your comments below.

elandarksky 02-08-2013 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rattraps123 (Post 7959921)
We need a tatical heavy Intrepid class starship


3 tatical bridge officer statons, 1 engineering station, 1 science station.
4 tatical consoles, 2 engineering consoles, 2 science consoles.
4 weapons forward, 3 aft


http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warship_Voyager

It shoudl be easy to put into the game. almost all models are made already - Rattraps123

Please leave your comments below.

*cough*
*stares at my signature* :D

Anywho, the ship in question was a incorrect historical representation which hasn't been created yet, wait until the ingame calender is a few thousand years forward... then maybe :p

shar487a 02-08-2013 11:12 AM

I would be happy to see a tactical version of the Galaxy-X as opposed to the bloated cow that currently wears its skin.

tovalmorgan 02-08-2013 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elandarksky (Post 7959961)
*cough*
*stares at my signature* :D

Anywho, the ship in question was a incorrect historical representation which hasn't been created yet, wait until the ingame calender is a few thousand years forward... then maybe :p

so how do you explain the Galaxy X being in this game? its from a future that never happened.


not to mention the countless number of 70+ year old ships flying around (ambassador, excelcior, D'Kyr to name a few)...


just cause it wasn't a "real ship" doesn't mean it wont show up in the game

noknagus 02-08-2013 12:02 PM

It's pretty much already in game, it's called the vesta class... look at the stats on the tac version.

stirling191 02-08-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tovalmorgan (Post 7960691)
so how do you explain the Galaxy X being in this game? its from a future that never happened.

The difference being that the Gal-X was from a possible future, not a mis-remembered (IE: it didn't happen) past. And if you hadn't noticed, STO is set *after* the "future" timeframe of All Good Things. The Gal-X may very well have been built.

corgatag 02-08-2013 12:18 PM

That was a fun episode! I think this is a cool idea.

What would make it cooler is if this wasn't just another science ship at all.

I think it should be primarily be a Destroyer with a science-y spin. For example: grab the stats from the Chimera ( http://www.stowiki.org/Chimera_Heavy_Destroyer ) and swap the sci/eng stations/consoles.

I bet there are some fun ideas for the Z-store/lockbox console in the episode. I'd have to rewatch it.

The main challenge would probably be to imagine up a KDF counterpart so they don't cry foul.

Edit: Actually, the other challenge would be to make up a believable story for this ship. Mirror universe ships and Timeships are "real" in the STO universe, but Warship Voyager was merely a perversion of history. If the writers find a credible way to get around this, I'd consider it a stroke of creative genius.

tovalmorgan 02-08-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stirling191 (Post 7961021)
The difference being that the Gal-X was from a possible future, not a mis-remembered (IE: it didn't happen) past. And if you hadn't noticed, STO is set *after* the "future" timeframe of All Good Things. The Gal-X may very well have been built.


see red quoted text.

but you're right, im sure starfleet went and spent tons of resources and time to develop an upgrade to a ship class that was outmatched in every category by the Sovereign.

and they said "F the treaty" and built them with cloaking devices...

wildweasal 02-08-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rattraps123 (Post 7959921)
We need a tatical heavy Intrepid class starship


3 tatical bridge officer statons, 1 engineering station, 1 science station.
4 tatical consoles, 2 engineering consoles, 2 science consoles.
4 weapons forward, 3 aft


http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Warship_Voyager

It shoudl be easy to put into the game. almost all models are made already - Rattraps123

Please leave your comments below.

yeah not gonna happen.....move on please nothing to see here

stirling191 02-08-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tovalmorgan (Post 7962231)
see red quoted text.

but you're right, im sure starfleet went and spent tons of resources and time to develop an upgrade to a ship class that was outmatched in every category by the Sovereign.

and they said "F the treaty" and built them with cloaking devices...

Sure. I mean, it's not like there isn't a functioning Romulan Government, or plenty of other Federation ships that are equipped with cloaking devices. Nor is it at all true that STO game mechanics have absolutely no bearing on a ship's capabilities in actual Trek canon...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:31 AM.