Star Trek Online

Star Trek Online (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/index.php)
-   Star Trek Online General Discussion (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   Suggestion to address perceived cruiser issues (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=550351)

tsurutafan01 02-13-2013 08:04 PM

Suggestion to address perceived cruiser issues
 
So the general theme lately has been "Escorts evil, Cruisers poor and neglected".

I don't think fixing it is as simple as "make beams kill things" because then you still have the problem of, say, three little Breen frigates that do more damage than a Breen cruiser in the Deferi dailies. Just increasing beam damage or reducing beam drain doesn't address the core issue: that big ships don't hit harder than little ships *within the same class*. That's the issue that I see.

I think the best solution I can come up with is to tie a bonus to energy weapons that is related to a ship's maximum crew. The same beam on a ship with 200 crew would do less damage than one on a ship with 800. I haven't crunched the numbers on exactly how it would work. But I think this makes sense and would address the issue, somewhat.

I think the general idea would be that a ship with more total maximum crew would receive a bonus to base energy weapon damage. This could address the above kind of scenario: one big cruiser should hit hard enough to be more of a threat than three little ships that are not escorts.

It still won't hit nearly as hard as an escort with super duper dual cannons. It's not supposed to. I'm not looking to reinvent the wheel. And beam drain would still be beam drain. But it would in my opinion potentially address the issue of big cruisers being outclassed by several small ones where almost nothing in Trek suggests this should happen.

Thoughts?

avarseir 02-13-2013 08:14 PM

All this complain about cruisers is weird.. I find cruisers to be very resilient ships able to dish out awesome damage.

I'm hitting for 800-1k+ dmg per pulse on beam arrays and crits for 2-3k. With BO1, it can even hit up to 18-20k.

I manage my beam energy problem with creative thinking. I load 4x Plasma Manifolds, which gives me +15 weapon power, then i fly with custom energy setting (vs the standard template): highest level for shields, followed by AUX. I can still get 88 weapon power.

Then I load up EptA and Aux2Batt.. never ever have any problems with my energy management.

Nothing wrong with cruisers.. learn to embrace your skills.

I mean.. if one day Cryptic just decided to change all the comm Eng to comm Tac for all cruisers, I can guarantee that the complaint thread about cruisers will drop by 90% (only 10% of the threads about cruisers out there know what they're talking about, but even so the 10% mostly points out flaws in single ships vs the cruiser class general)

So be creative with your boff skills, don't just load 3x Eng Teams and 3x EptS on your boffs, you're setting yourself up for failure.

the issue is ppl always think Eng Boff skills are crap.. which is not true!

tsurutafan01 02-13-2013 08:15 PM

I'm not saying cruisers are broken. I don't believe that either.

I enjoy flying mine just fine.

I'm saying if three crummy cruisers can outclass one good cruiser, that's broken.

The issue isn't Cruisers vs. Escorts. The issue is how ships within their own group measure against each other.

avarseir 02-13-2013 08:26 PM

Tying crew size to dmg dealt is also a flawed idea. How scientifically will it be justified other than asking your extra crew members running in a hamster wheel to generate extra power for your beams.

Crew size should be used for better repair rates for hull/subsystems.

There was a talk about giving us a warp core equipment, there I can see some logic where a cruiser warp core gives higher bonus to ships power. Although an escort warp core gives higher bonus to only weapon power while sci ships get bonus to aux.

Your idea, no offense, is rather moot.

Klinks, if this guy gets his way, say goodbye to your BOPs. With 50 crew, it will be a joke on dps.

tsurutafan01 02-13-2013 08:27 PM

Quote:

How scientifically will it be justified other than asking your extra crew members running in a hamster wheel to generate extra power for your beams.
Bigger ships have larger warp cores, which produce more energy.

That's pretty standard Star Trek technobabble.

Quote:

Klinks, if this guy gets his way, say goodbye to your BOPs
I fly a BoP on my KDF account. But it's pretty obvious you're not very interested in conversation.

avarseir 02-13-2013 08:32 PM

Yes but bigger warp core does not equal more crew. Crew size has nothing to do how big your warp core is. Entreprise D had a huge crew complement but there were many scientists, civilians and even Children. That's also pretty standard Trek common sense.

Read what I type above on the warp core type ship equipment.

Its not that I'm uninterested, but it gets boring. There are at least 1 thread posted up per day on 'my cruiser should dps lotsa and lotsa'. And honestly, your idea is one of the worst so far.

avarseir 02-13-2013 08:45 PM

Oh oh, i got more:

Bigger ships right? So you need bigger energy requirement to maintain hull plating, bigger energy for the intertial dampeners, bigger energy requirement to maintain a big shield array, bigger energy required to run all the replicators, bigger energy to run the life support systems, bigger energy for bigger impulse engines.

So how much energy does that leave you?

In contrast, a smaller ship like BOP or Defiant, only need power for absolute critical systems. Thus, more power can be routed for weapons.

Thats Trek technobabble for you.

snoggymack22 02-13-2013 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by avarseir (Post 8041781)
Crew size has nothing to do how big your warp core is.

Michael Scott moment ... That's what she said!

snoggymack22 02-13-2013 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tsurutafan01 (Post 8041301)
Thoughts?

It's a creative approach, but there are some negatives to it.

What's it do to science ships that use beams and have smaller crews?
What's it do to cruisers that use cannons and turrets?
What's it do to the occasional escort using a dual beam bank?

I don't know. But it does seem like there's some tricky parts to what you propose.

sander233 02-13-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by avarseir (Post 8041461)
All this complain about cruisers is weird.. I find cruisers to be very resilient ships able to dish out awesome damage.

I'm hitting for 800-1k+ dmg per pulse on beam arrays and crits for 2-3k. With BO1, it can even hit up to 18-20k.

...

the issue is ppl always think Eng Boff skills are crap.. which is not true!

I'm with you 100% on this.

Granted, I do not yet have a max-level Fed engineer toon (I'm working on it though - he's at level 29) but my lvl 50 Tac and Sci Fed toons have both dabbled in cruisers, and my KDF has never driven anything else except a Kar'Fi and that only in solo PvE.

That said, my Fed engineer does not feel noticeably impaired doing mission content compared to my past experiences. And I've had a lot of fun with the other guys driving big slow beam boats to great affect. You just have to know how to use them, and the abilities (your own and your BOffs) to get the most out of them.

Everyone knows about the shield and hull heals but after talking to a bunch of people about their BOff setups I find a lot of very good BOff abilities are totally ignored. Such as:

Aceton Beam - this debuffs the target's energy weapon damage by 25-75% (depending on level) for 30 seconds and there is no counter-effect. Also applies a radiation DoT.

Auxillary to Inertial Dampeners - using this plus Evasive Maneuvers will make you fly. You will actually exceed full impulse velocity while in combat. It also buffs your turn rate. Again, use in combination with evasive maneuvers or an attack pattern, and you can make an Ody do a pirouette. Suddenly that raptor who was camping off your port quarter behind your forward beam array arc and ahead of your aft torpedo arc is dead in your sights. This skill also adds a very useful kinetic damage resistance buff and immunity to repel and disable attacks. (So click if you see anything labeled "tricobalt" headed your way.)

Boarding Party - not too useful in PvP (it's easy enough to counter) but against NPCs it is highly effective at disabling subsystems.

Directed Energy Modulation - this is a beam-boat captain's best friend. It greatly improves the shield penetration power of any and every beam weapon you have for 30 seconds. Use with beam overload for best results.

Eject Warp Plasma - a personal favorite of mine. There are few PvP moments more satisfying then opening the plasma taps and catching a cloaked Defiant or BoP who thought he could sneak up behind you for an easy kill. Not only do you decloak him, you also set him on fire and slow him down so he can't escape the cloud. At least, not before you've dealt enough to damage to him to make him use ramming speed to try to run away. Yes, a player can use hazard emitters to put out the plasma fires and APO to break the hold effect, but I find there's always that moment of "WTF?" that causes just enough hesitation to leave them very screwed. Oh and those annoying swarms of enemy fighters? Fried like bacon.

I never take a cruiser into combat without at least Aux2ID and DEM, and at least one of the "offensive debuffs." (Always Aceton Beam III for pulling Tacsorts teeth in PvP.) Sadly, many, many cruiser captains do neglect these abilities, and therein lies their gravest error.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 PM.