Star Trek Online

Star Trek Online (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/index.php)
-   C-Store, ZEN, and Promotions (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/forumdisplay.php?f=200)
-   -   Feedback on Andorian ship (http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=559891)

gibbspt 02-19-2013 09:08 PM

Feedback on Andorian ship
 
Well ive notice that the Bridge officer layout on the andorian ship depends on the class... one thing that i dont like, mainly because on other ships that are sold in 3 pack ships they have the same bridge officer layout (odyssey pack and vesta pack) and only change the console layout...
so i think that the only bridge officer layout that the andorian ship should have is the engineering one
1 commander tac
1 lt commander tac
1 lt engi
1 ensign universal
1 lt universal

and maintain the console slots layout that they have for the 3 ships

This is because a lt tac bridge officer with a commander and a lt commander is just useless
if you do this PWE and cryptic you would be doing a great job =) and i would buy the pack :P

wildbill0185 02-19-2013 09:36 PM

Bride officer layout
 
I totally agree, a Lt. Tact station makes not wanted to buy the pack.

cbalanca 02-19-2013 10:07 PM

I would have to agree!

This makes sense!

lewstelamon01 02-19-2013 10:49 PM

I kinda like the idea of that much firepower forward...but if you get behind it, it's nothing more than a cannon tied to a raft.

dova25 02-19-2013 11:39 PM

If the tactical Kumari seating is so bad make this version available to kdf .

5 tac consoles /7 fore cannons (5 from ship+2 floating ) it is the dream ship of a kdf raptor captain.

I could use it (including tac lt seat) to full extent on my kdf char.

pokersmith1 02-19-2013 11:55 PM

4 fore DHCs in traditional comm/lt comm tac config. 1 fore torpedo (quantum/romulan hyper plasma) backed by lt tac slot (ts1/ts2 or hy1/hy2). Think about it.

countesscorvinna 02-21-2013 02:13 PM

I'd have also like to seen a Mk XII version of the Andorian Phasers with it. The Vesta comes with a Mk XII cannon, it should have at least been an option for this ship. And yes, the lt tactical is a little weird, but it could have uses. Personally, I'd use the Charal for its boff layout.

jcsww 02-21-2013 03:12 PM

I have always thought the B'Rel Retrofit should of had 5 fore and 2 aft for weapons instead of just 4 fore and 2 aft. This specific weapon layout should have been exclusive to the KDF side instead of being on Fed ships.

crappynamerules 02-21-2013 03:30 PM

I usually disagree when new fed ships come out and KDF-focused players complain about the new ship, and how is renders something they have stupid or worthless or no longer "unique" to the faction. But this time I have to agree. Klingons should be the ones focused on the forward-firing ouch. Hell, their T3 battlecruiser has the same layout as their T5 bird of prey. That's how much they love focusing their fire forward. I'm not sure why this Andorian ship needed to have a fifth forward slot. It doesn't seem to take much, if any penalty in trade-offs. If I had to choose between this thing and a T5 escort, it would be absolutely no contest.

pwecangetlost 02-21-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crappynamerules (Post 8239341)
I'm not sure why this Andorian ship needed to have a fifth forward slot. It doesn't seem to take much, if any penalty in trade-offs. If I had to choose between this thing and a T5 escort, it would be absolutely no contest.

Why go through the effort of making things unique, different and balanced, when its easier to make something sell when its just outright better?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 PM.