The Case for Damage Control.
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
03-15-2010, 05:05 PM
Originally Posted by
Ever been in that position where you get the drop on an enemy and score a solid torpedo volley and see his health drop about 80%? only to see him hit you with a tractor beam, disable your ship with a probe and then launch a salvo of his own and full strength right into your face? Ever asked yourself how he can do that with only 20% health left?
The problem in this scenario is that regardless of hull strength the enemy still has all his systems. This also counts for you, the player. You can have 3% health and ALL of your systems still intact. I personally have a problem with this aspect of STO Combat. It might be because very other space combat sim or star trek space combat game has had this mechanic. Maybe its because this mechanic has been clearly reflected in Star Trek since 1966.
The idea of Damage Control, losing systems during combat, is part and parcel to the experience of captaining a ship. Why is it not part of this games otherwise excellent starship combat? Can a developer speak to this issue? Does anyone else notice this missing level of depth in the combat? does it seem right to be fighting a NPC that is nearly dead but just as dangerous as he was at 100% health?
/signed. But then I'm used to SFB, Car Wars, BattleTech (the original, not that wizkids abomination), and SFC. Also to a lesser extent Fasa's attempt to horn in on SFB's pie, Space Opera, SpaceMaster and Living Steel.
BUT - To make that work we can't be taking out Admiral level ships in our light cruisrs. I can see, with the mass market mmo types, why they didn't go down that road. Fun as it would have been. Love the game, but it's no SFC, yanno....