Don't add a t5 Fed Carrier. Add a full blown Battleship instead.
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
03-31-2010, 11:15 PM
Originally Posted by
The precedent is set in 3 ways. Firstly the Akira is a carrier/torpedo boat....we know this is what it was designed for. Secondly The dominon war showed us fighters in the engagment and eluded to them being launched from a fed ship. Thridly the klingon carrier is in game now so cryptic could impliment something similar now considering the game mechanics are there sans a little tweaking.
We....the game do not need bigger and bigger ships, especially at this point, we need the middle fleshed out if anything. What you want isn't a "battleship" we have that in the Sov and star cruiser you want a dreadnaught. Maybe after the add more levels dreadnaughts make sense but they don't now at RA5.
There are a whole host of ships they could add on both sides to flesh out the lower ranks that would make much more sense....ie the excelsior.
I think you may miss the point of this thread. It says "Don't add a fed carrier, add a full blown battleship instead."
This isn't the push for carrier thread. We're in this thread to discuss the possibilities of a battleship in place and in answer to a carrier.
I know its confusinf because everyone gets so up tight over this ridiculous carrier issue, but i think its best if we only talk about it in the thread that has to do with it.