Content Rating and Approval Process Details
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
10-27-2010, 08:04 AM
Originally Posted by
I would suggest that the people who are testing the mission orginally dont even get to rate it, as that is not the purpose of the review per your comments. The purpose of the review is only to determine whether the mission contains inappropriate content or not. That being the case, what the person thinks of the mission really doesnt matter at that point. This will allow missions that make it past the review and go live to do so with a "fresh start", without any positive or negative ratings attatched to them.
If some reviewer found your mission crap, what's to stop him from doing it again and rate it?
If he liked it, why should he have to play it again to rate it?
It would be a nonsense limitation.
Stop worrying that some AH will rate your mission low and flag you because he hates you. Worry about delivering a good mission within the guidelines (once you know them
) and the rest will sort itself out. Have some faith.