View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
11-29-2010, 08:26 PM
Originally Posted by
you seem to be very adept at going around and saying NO to many people, lets hear your thoughts.
err... i already made my point clear. earlier in this thread and another even.
Why build a carrier when you can summon holographic battleships that hurt?
Or if you really need fighters: why not a squadron of holo fighters?
The Tech is there, we are using it. Sci officers get to summon holographic battleships.
One would think that this path of technology gets primary attention from the engineering corps.
yknow. because it can summon ******n battleships out of thin air? ships that fire torpedoes? and phasers? And are actually quite bothersome if you skilled into holotech?
Summonable Holoship = better than any sort of carrier you could ever come up with, and you can NEVER explain away the fact we are actively using a tech that allows sci officers to summon a small fleet of holoships.
If i were the head honcho of Starfleet, ANY admiral, engineer or other kind of dude coming into my office proposing a carrier in light of this summon holo fleet tech, would get led behind a shed to be mercykilled because the sheer amount of stupidity that officer apparently has contracted is not curable at that point.
holoships = better than fighters (fluff wise)
Id pump all resources needed towards a project that produces ships that summon holoships at will.
Because its seriously awesome.