Unofficial standards of review for player made missions
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
12-06-2010, 02:35 PM
Originally Posted by
I think reviews should start and stop with whether they work on a technical level (gameplay, grammar, etc.) I might be alone but even TOS writers took risks on #2 & #3 in your list.
This makes David Lynch look conventional.
Perhaps I should have said "rating" rather than "review". From what we've been told, the "review" is simply to make sure it works and doesnt contain inappropriate content. However, the RATING is based on our personal enjoyment of the mission. Regarding your example, if it was in the shows, then whether we like it or not it *is* Star Trek. So theres no way any of the ST shows can be "un-trek".