Content Rating and Approval Process Details
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
07-03-2011, 06:48 PM
Originally Posted by
Although it is a sentiment I can appreciate, I don't think that, for example, movie critics are required to have directed or produced a movie before they write their reviews. I'm sure that there are some things in UGC missions that are bugged, which is no fault of the author - but someone playing the mission will expect the author to have played through and changed buggy things. That might not be the main issue, however; if the issue is people rating things based on content and story, I don't have a problem with anyone ripping missions apart.
I agree with you about not having to have created missions in order to review content. That would be silly. I also agree with you about ripping a mission apart. That is up to the individual reviewer and how they want to handle it. I try to submit a review that may help the author improve the mission. In the end I feel that will improve UGC missions and make the game better for everyone.