USS ENTERPRISE 1701-F for FAIL
View Single Post
Join Date: Dec 2007
08-12-2011, 08:24 AM
Originally Posted by
Its all about how large they create the model..
Also, just because the Sovereign was smaller than the Galaxy doesn't mean it wasn't more advanced than the Galaxy.
The Bio Neural gel paks, the warp core, the "hull hugging" shields.. ect.
Actually, I think that while the Galaxy had more bulk, the Sovereign was longer. There is debate as to the number of decks on the Enterprise-E. 24,26, and 30 were all quoted on screen. I myself buy into 30 decks. That still doesn't compair to the 42 decks on the Galaxy. And at least 2 or 3 of those decks were completely occupied by the Uber Deuterium Storage tank!
I agree that the new "Odyessy" class looks so much like the Soveregin, that is should simply be another Assault Cruiser skin. The next Enterprise should not be commissioned yet, but when it does, it should have a more bulky appearance like the Consitution or the Galaxy, and not the "sleek" design like the Excelsior or the Soveregin.