View Single Post
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
02-08-2012, 08:14 AM
Originally Posted by Alastor_Forthright View Post
I think about 1/4th of the way into the article it became clear the article was focusing only on the positive notes, and none of the negative notes of the past year. And even then the positive notes are not very positive, most of them are just reused/refurbished preexisting content, but the articles twists and spins them in an incredibly positive manner, so it's at least to me, biased in that regard. I'd have preferred if it had balanced itself out with "This is the good they did, but this is the bad they did too"
Admittedly, it was supposed to be a bit of positive review. If you had read some of my previous columns that focused on the negatives, you might get a clearer picture of why I felt it was important to look on the bright side of things for once.