Captain Archer - a short evaluation
View Single Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
09-02-2012, 10:25 PM
Originally Posted by
Well I apologies for not knowing how to spell an actors name, big deal. The point was there is a History with the Borg pre voyager.
You just don't get it, look by putting the Borg into Archers Time line (yes we know they where there given what happened in the next gen series and movies) Starfleet would have what had a couple of hundred yrs to study the Borg tech and integrate it into their own but they didn't because its not apart of the original next gen story so it stuff's it.
I didn't say I hated the movie I just said I don't like how it stuffs the whole Star Trek theme I don't care that you and others try and justify it as an alternative reality.
I have it in my collection, I have all of Star Trek bar the Originals.
This is my opinion you can argue till your blue in the face it ain't gonna change lol, call me ignorant and all the names under the sun its still not going to change my opinion OK!
It's not a fan justification. It's stated in the movie that it's an alternate reality.
R.I.P. Caspian Division.
An expensive lesson that one compromised account can undo the hours of work and hundreds of dollars spent in good faith by a fleet.