View Single Post
Commander
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 462
# 120
09-06-2012, 04:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterde3 View Post
Well, the two fallacies I can think of immedeatelly are these:

Klingon Tricorder in Star Trek 3:

http://www.yourprops.com/movieprops/...-Tricorder.jpg

We can also see Uhura and Chekov using a Klingon Tricorder in Star Trek 4:

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/231...3115h07m07.png

http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/2...3115h25m33.png

assuming anyone wants to make some dumb joke about their performance or anything.

The second gunner that Kruge used in Star Trek 3, managed to Target Subsystem Engines correctly so kilemorgan intentionally ignored that fact since he/she obviously saw the third film.
Not to mention the gunner managed to do that with a torpedo which is probably a whole lot more of a challenge than using a beam.
I think you missed the point of his "True Science vessel but with more hull, 4/4 weapons, and not limited to beams" hypothetical.

I read it as being disgusted by the idea that Klingons should get, not just a service-able science vessel, but that it should be more 'warlike' in ways that make it better overall.