TRIBBLE Maintenance and Release Notes - September 25, 2012
View Single Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
09-26-2012, 10:33 AM
Nice patch, will be great to see more diversity.
Also, how are we gonna recognise the NPC Azura and Vov'wI from the player ones?
Originally Posted by
Since escorts get everything anyway so why don't they get rid of cruisers completely?
Cruisers are the iconic ships of star trek, not escorts.
For the devs, cruisers are good to make $$, because they are popular, but thats all.
Escorts are still the devs favorite ships. They get any advantage the devs can find, that just makes me sick.
Seeing Cruisers so disadvantaged and useless, shows how careles the devs are when it comes to ships. They just want their escorts get every advantage, why dont you just give them some more extra weapons power (+50) or some additional Cmdr. Enigneering BOFF?
Is it so hard to understand that in Star Trek cruisers are not just tanks, they are the biggest, and most powerful and dangerous ships. Escorts are just some small special ships that can generat high burst damage for a short time, but they aren't good on their own. Cruisers shouldn't need protection of escorts, it's the other way round.
Giving Escorts even more maneuverability shows the devs haven't understood anything about star trek at all.
(or they just don't care, and want to boost their favourite ships even more)
Seriously i'm really infuriated about this.
Not saying escorts are underpowered or something, but I'm liking flying cruisers much more. Also, I perform better in them than I do in other ship types. Therefore I see no reason to consider them "disadvantaged and useless". Also, there's loads of them (on FED side, anyway). So I see no specific reason for the devs to focus on them.
: Bring in the
: Add Tier 6 staple KDF ship types: Carrier and Bird of prey.
: Give us Asylums for Romulans
Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!