View Single Post
Join Date: Aug 2012
10-24-2012, 05:53 AM
It's still way too powerful, for a hundred years old ship.
(Giving it more firepower/offensive power than a Galaxy Class is a personal insult IMHO.)
I always deeply hated that ship since 1984 when i first saw it in ST: III. It's ugly, misshaped and completely bad proportioned. It's Engineering hull is way too Bulky, its Saucer is much too small and the nacelles are totally oversized.
I have no idea what Leaonard Nimoy has been smoking when choosing that ship.
I personally hate that the devs made that ugly bucket this powerful compared to other ships, especially compared to the Galaxy Class. It should have been a CMDR level Cruiser, but never a T5 ship. The devs instead should have given the "heavy cruiser" the BOFF & Console Layout of the T5 Excelsior.
I hope my english is understandable, since most of the time i find it difficult to find the right words in my native language.
Originally Posted by
...Yet, being peaceful does not equal being weak or foolish and I think that is what people don't get or don't want to get. They seem to think that in order to be taken seriously you must go all badass-military, because that's "cool" and everything else is just whimps.
Cryptic: a alternative 2409 Starfleet Design, please