View Single Post
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 6
11-08-2012, 11:07 PM
I don't think so. I find it hard to justify the cost. In the broad picture is simply weak for it's cost. I would love to buy it, but don't won't to buy a gimped ship.

Now let me compare this ship for 2000 to regent for 2500. The tankiness of both ships is the same, but regent will eventually get the fleet version that outclasses the fleet heavy cruiser retrofit in every way except the turn rate.

Now if the fleet heavy cruiser retrofit had 9 or 10 turn rate and 35-40 inertia (it's small mass does not justify the 30 inertia) it would be interesting alternative.

Oh well. Why must all good looking fed ships have crap stats It's almost like someone has biass for certain ships

Last edited by dalnar83; 11-08-2012 at 11:54 PM.