What the Ambassador should be.
View Single Post
Join Date: Jun 2012
01-25-2013, 10:12 AM
Originally Posted by
I'm just pointing out the obvious-obviously. Galaxy class is the one of the stample item of Star Trek franchise. I'm really curious why CBS let them handle TNG with such ignorance. I understand that most Cryptic's devs are DS9 fanboys, but that should not excuse them.
Galaxy > Ambassador > Excelsior is what one would expect, simpley because of their age and technology used.
In STO, it's most likely going to be the exact opposite.
Yeah, there's an obvious Dev bias against the Galaxy R, they didn't even give it a universal ensign when they gave it's opposite number the Negh'var one. To say nothing of it's better turn rate, cloaking device and DHCs (which are only marginally useful admittedly). But hey, saucer separation, right?