View Single Post
Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 267
# 121
02-13-2013, 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antep01 View Post
Can u give the Ambassador plz a higher Turn rate,for a Support Ship and Possible for a Sci and his Buffs this Turnrate is a joke.The Kling Ship is Ways better.
The simple answer from the Devs? NO WAY!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by paragon92518 View Post
But...WHY? It is still outclassed by the Fleet Excelsior...(both in firepower and movement).

Could the Devs maybe UP the inertia??? (Since they have already cracked the gavel on any attempts to +1 the turn-rate) by declaring: "Thou shalt have a crappy 7 turn rate!"

The hull does NOT need to be increased. 39.5K hull is FINE just where the free version was. I think 95% of players would keep the hull unchanged in exchange for a +1 turn, or the like.

-----------------------------------------------

Fleet Kamarag Battle Cruiser

Can Equip Cannons
Extra Universal Consoles
Base Turn Rate: 10.5 degrees per second
Cloaking Device
+10 Weapon Power, +10 Engine Power


VS.


CRAP-assador Fleet Support Cruiser Retrofit

+4,950 hull
+1 Device Slot
+5 to All Subsystem Power



Hmmmmm...When compared there's no argument that the Kamarag OUTCLASSES Ambassador. It's actually disgusting. I would GLADLY TRADE the extra hull and the device slot to get an extra Universal Slot, a +3.5 base turn, Cannon-use, and +10 Weapon Power.

What would YOU rather spend YOUR MONEY on??? I think its blatently obvious which ship is the better bang for the buck.
In fact, they are so AGAINST the concept, that they deleted my post on Dev Blog #35 where I asked that question. Their REFUSAL to budge on inertia/and or turning isn't going to happen...not now...not ever.
http://media.photobucket.com/image/dofftrader/yoreantiques/DOFFtrader.gif

Last edited by paragon92518; 02-13-2013 at 10:06 AM.