View Single Post
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 170
# 142
02-24-2013, 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markhawkman View Post
No... I said I don't know what that phrase meant....
Exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by markhawkman View Post
I didn't say it was a rule.... I was saying that smaller sample sizes aren't quite large enough for a conclusive result.
You said that the current sample size isn't statistically adequate (false) and that there was something special about having a sample size of 42^2 which would make it adequate (false).

Quote:
Originally Posted by markhawkman View Post
That's nice. It neatly explains why your analysis is so complex.
And why, unlike yours, it also happens to be correct.