View Single Post
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 830
# 26
03-22-2013, 11:39 AM
Originally Posted by questerius View Post
First of all, i am glad the flamethrower is getting attention. This is one weapon i look forward to purchasing.

As for changing the damage type to "fire", would that not make the damage output susceptible to the fire extinguisher the federation can get on a mission?
the way i meant it was that real life flamethrowers fire napalm which causes it to stick to any surface and burn even against non-flammable materials like cement or bare dirt and rocks. But since the STO flamethrower uses plasma instead of napalm or jellied petroleum, the question i'm posing is should the plasma actually "stick" to it's surface like the plasma grenade or be more like a flamethrower that uses a much lower viscosity fuel to project?
On the subject of Abramsverse stuff in STO:
And more reasons against JJ Trek:
And even more: