View Single Post
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 7
04-08-2013, 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by icybrilliance View Post
Why 45k hull? Your "no more no less" is disingenuous. Fleet Odyssey has 42k. Galaxy has 44k.

1.2 shield modifier? Again higher than any Fleet Cruiser. Odyssey is 1.15 and the others are 1.1 or 1.0.

Battle Cloak? Why? You compare against Klinks but their Battlecruisers have a normal cloak. Their smaller ships may have a Battlecloak but in return have weaker shields, hull and fewer weapons. Just enjoy being one of the two fed ships that can cloak.

Phaser Lance could probably do with being looked at. But it's a completely free ability. It's not like it's taking up a console slot. When comparing to Javelin you left out faults such as it draining more power and that the ship it's on has far less hull and shields. Also as far as I'm aware the proc is same as every other disruptor weapon.

8 turn? Again higher than other Fleet Cruisers apart from Cheyenne which is equal.

And in addition to these goodies your completely changing the console and boff layout?

Good luck.
True, his demands are little off the scale for reasonable aproach. I think if the ship is gonna get fleet refit it just needs few things.


Access to saucer sep console
+1 more tactical console
Fixed phaser lance, preferably as heavy hitting beam in 5th weapon slot, -1 aft weapon slot
44k hps, 1.1 shield mod

As for the BO layout, regent/d'kora layout would be probably best. Universal ensign would be great