Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1 April 15th Engineering Notes
04-15-2011, 12:33 PM
From this month's Engineering Notes:

http://forums.startrekonline.com/sho...d.php?t=211534

Quote:
Under Investigation

These issues are hot topics in the QA and CS world. It by no means represents all the bugs we're looking into, but instead new issues that
I want you to know we are on top of.
  • Fire at Will Issues


So if you're a PvP fleets using FAW to "send out the message", I think its safe to say the message has been sent.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
04-15-2011, 01:25 PM
Thank for bringing some good news, Azurian.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
04-15-2011, 01:56 PM
Long Term Goals include more PvP maps and a Territory Control game... so here's to hoping.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4 What about FAW?
04-15-2011, 02:41 PM
I wanted to make some sarcastic remark about FAW being fine, or wondering what made the Devs think FAW was a topic of interest, or geeking out over being mentioned in an Engineering report but I couldn't be bothered to decide on one so I'll just leave the laundry list here.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
04-15-2011, 03:37 PM
I am mad.

there is no mention of: changing SS, make sci team work as a counter, make AF better and giving me a toggle /Target Hale
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
04-15-2011, 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvs5191 View Post
Long Term Goals include more PvP maps and a Territory Control game... so here's to hoping.
while i hope so aswell the long term goal part is what i dont like. In my opinion pvp should be on a higher priority spot then new C-store uniforms...

Long Term can be in 2 years...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 7
04-15-2011, 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurian View Post
So if you're a PvP fleets using FAW to "send out the message", I think its safe to say the message has been sent.
They'll find some other excuse
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 8
04-15-2011, 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTheYak
They'll find some other excuse
i blame the lack of maps

but yeah, if its not one thing. its another. i cant wait till things go back to "normal" and everything ends up the same.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
04-15-2011, 10:07 PM
Meh, it's labeled as "Under Investigation" so I don't find it being too quick to being fixed.. When it reaches "in Testing" Then I'll get out the party balloons.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 10
04-15-2011, 11:49 PM
Quote:
Meh, it's labeled as "Under Investigation" so I don't find it being too quick to being fixed.. When it reaches "in Testing" Then I'll get out the party balloons.
I don't think "Under Investigation" for QA things moves up much in the Engineering Reports. It can happen in one week, or in 6 months, without a change on the ER.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 PM.