Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
Just got my Galaxy-X. I am using two torps up front, but what is better for the other two slots? Cannons or beams?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
09-27-2011, 11:35 AM
You only need one torp on the front or rear at a time. Anymore than that and it gets a weee bit banjaxed.A build you may want to try, is all turrets. Spec for canons, 4 aft, 3 bow, 1 torp.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
09-27-2011, 11:38 AM
I've tried all turrets in the past, wasn't a huge fan. With the better global cooldown on torps now, I like running 2. But the jury is still out. I guess is heavy cannons worth it over beams?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4
09-27-2011, 11:45 AM
I stand corrected then.

Currently I run beams on my GX, but that's also an Engineer character. I run 1 QTorp on the bow, with 2 beam arrays, and 1 DBB. But with the Venture skin's bug I run with 3 arrays and 1 Torp. Over all loadout is 6 beam arrays and 2 torps.

What's the cool down on the torpedoes down to? I may have to give the dual torps a try
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
09-27-2011, 11:47 AM
Down to 1 sec, I believe. What's the venture bug? And thanks for the beam tip.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
09-27-2011, 11:56 AM
The Venture-class skin for the Dreadnaught, the Double Beam Banks, and DHC / DCs fire from the very edge of the saucer section, not the weapon mounts on the immediate flanks of the bridge module.

Something you might want to consider btw, going into the BEAM skill points will have an effect on your phaser lance. Personally, I run Phasers / Beams on mine, so it gives more of a bonus to my lance.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 7
09-27-2011, 12:45 PM
Gal-X is a fun ship but needs attention (and BOff skills) to make it more maneuverable. I just have trouble justifying cannons on them. I prefer 3 beams up front with a quantum, and 3 beams in back with a peng torpedo. To each his own, of course.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 8
09-27-2011, 04:15 PM
I agree and disagree with many of the opinions posted.

I REFUSE to go all turrets. Pathetic DPS and the ship is capable of so very much more (whether many see it or not). You limit yourself if you use that as a crutch, plain and simple.

I personally enjoy 3x Dual Banks up front with a Quantum, 3x Turrets rear with a Hargh'Peng. I have... "tricks" of making sure my enemy finds themselves in my firing arcs, so this isn't a hindrance (note that dual beams and torpedoes have the same arc range of fire).

I used to use cannons, and while the ship can pull off some impressive shots and decisive kills (especially fresh after decloaking for a surprise attack), you become what is widely referred to as a "one trick pony".

You might get that trick off once, before an enemy wises up and learns not to let it happen again. After that, you're useless.

Dual Beams are tremendous DPS, and still offer double the range of cannons. A skilled Captain won't miss the range of single beams, but will still appreciate the range increase over cannons.

But, these are my thoughts/experiences. I enjoy the Galaxy-X in PvP, even moreso with idiots who are silly enough to claim Galaxy-X is weak, and I have the glorious opportunity to shove that down their throats as they die by my hand.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
09-28-2011, 10:40 AM
Because of the lt tactical station I find cannon fire limited on the GX no rapid fire 2 or scatter volley 2 available. Best to stick cannons on an escort and beams on a cruiser. GX really could do with a lt commander tactical station and better turn rate.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 10
09-29-2011, 04:35 PM
true...
I would like to see the Gx brought in line with the AC on turn rate, but, question is what should it give up?

To give it that extra 1.0 turn rate, and Phaser Lance, that would begin tipping the balance and make it a pay2win type of ship. We all went through a great deal to ensure (including Cryptic) to make sure it was not that.

Still perhaps lossing extra tac, and dropping to a LT engineer and give it the ac turn rate and the excel's BO slots? Still that may be too much as well.

Hard to find a compromise that would compare to the standing AC.

Myself, I find no problem with the Gx, love the new skin btw, add to that I run it as a beamer with torps, she does well. I understand her mechanics and fly her directly as a cruiser.

Far as changes? Just remember, her stance vs other cruisers does well, outfitted properly. So to get something, understand it has to loose something. To give it the turn rate and the BO spec we are talking about would make it a touch too much IMHO.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 PM.