Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1 Possible Escort Build
11-19-2011, 05:29 AM
I've been trying to come up with an escort build for STFs using the fleet escort / siege destroyer.
Couple of ground rules; It has to include Target Shields Subsystem III (and some sort of beam) and I would prefer it had 2 torpedo launchers up front, this however isn't vital.

I was thinking:

Front Weapons:
Photon / Quantum Torpedo Launcher
Photon / Quantum Torpedo Launcher
Disruptor Dual Beam Bank
Quad Disruptor Cannons / Disruptor Dual Beam Bank (major changes to BO skills needed)

Rear Weapons:
Disruptor Beam Array
Disruptor Beam Array / Photon / Quantum Torpedo Launcher
Photon / Quantum Torpedo Launcher

Bridge officer skills would be:
Tactical:
AP: B III, B:TSS III, C:RF I, T:HY I
T:HY III, C:RF I, B:O I / Tactical Team

Engineer:
EPtS II / Aux2SIF I, Engineering Team I
Engineering Team I

Science:
TSS II, HE I
OR
PH II, TSS I


What changes would people make? I know 3 team abilities is pretty fail and its short of shield heals but Duty Officers and Brace for Impact take care of the latter.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
11-19-2011, 08:02 AM
Hmm, I would make several changes there.

Drop the rear torpedo for a turret. If you really really want to keep target shields, then go 2 dual cannons front, 2 turrets rear, and a beam array rear, otherwise drop it and go 3 turrets rear. Your main problem is that you lack forward firepower which drops shields much quicker on small targets. Target shields has a long cooldown so you cannot depend on it.

For engineering BOFFs, forget engineering team, it isn't necessary, and obviously gives you serious cooldown overlaps. I would go with EPTS 1 x2 and Aux to SIF 1.

For science, get hazard emitters 1 and 2 for some good hull healing and shield neutralizer neutralizing.

For Tac BOFFs, Beta 3 is good, but only works on hull damage, so you must have their shields down first. Whether your team can do that for you or not is the question. I would tend to prefer CRF 3 and APB 1 instead, but STFs are team oriented so beta 3 and CRF 1 is still a solid choice.

Two torpedoes up front should be okay especially with the DOFFs for them. But I would get Torpedo spread 3 if at all possible, spread 2 if not. I don't believe HYT is worth it with twin torpedoes up front, when you could instead be throwing torpedoes at everything. You'll want to pair it with scatter volley, either 1 or 2 depending on which torpedo spread you can get.

For ensign powers you definitely want to keep the tactical team. I would drop beam overload for either fire at will if you keep the beam, high yield torpedo 1, or even another tactical team, whichever you prefer.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
11-19-2011, 08:28 AM
Foxrocks: Don't take this the wrong way because I'm not trying to be insulting. Do you find you die a lot in STFs? Torpedo Spread, Fire At WIll and Scatter Volley are good for one thing. Agroing multiple borg ships and getting your *** blown off.

I have found the STFs are very single target orientated. Barring the trash you have to mop up, which is minimal and no problem for multiple people, you can really only hit one Nanite Transformer / Transformer / Gate at a time making multiple target attacks less useful than their single target varients.

You made some very good points but I disagree with some of them and i'll tell you why.

2 copies of EPtS. Ok sounds good on paper however; either you are getting spammed by shield neutralisers from multiple targets in which case this is a useless skill, or you are only getting hit by one every now and again. As shield neutraliser can miss (depending on your defence stat) a single hazard emitters is enough to keep it cleansed, transfer shield strength is a better shield heal and Engineering team is the most effective hull heal in the game as far as HP / Second goes.
If I keep 2x Tactical Team 1 I can run EPtE I (for when I am in seige mode) and EPtS I.

You suggested 2 dual cannons up front with 2 torpedo launchers. This means I have to get the enemy in my rear arc to use Target Shields Subsystems. Not great as it is and should be my opening beam attack. Ok I'll admit its not as useful as it once was given all the targets in STFs that have no shields anyway, but its very nice to be able to drop the shields of the Tactical Cubes long enough for the group to rip them apart. Saves a lot of time.

AP:B III is staying for sure. With the damage nerf to AP:O its almost certainly the best AP I can get and combining it with Sensor Scan = 1 dead something.

Flying the Siege Destroyer makes speccing BOs rather tricky because it shares a 15 second global cooldown with Beam Overload but not, oddly enough, Target Shields Subsystems.

Unfortunatly due to the skill tree changes greatly decreasing the possible drain effect and the lack of a console effecting the duration it is not enough to use TSSS II any more. Double HY III was fun to fire off inside 3 seconds.

I will seriously consider your idea to take turrets in the rear. However I have found that C:RF really screws with the power drain on your ship. Might not be too bad with so many torpedo launchers though.

Please keep the feedback comming.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4
11-19-2011, 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korhil
Foxrocks: Don't take this the wrong way because I'm not trying to be insulting. Do you find you die a lot in STFs? Torpedo Spread, Fire At WIll and Scatter Volley are good for one thing. Agroing multiple borg ships and getting your *** blown off.

I have found the STFs are very single target orientated. Barring the trash you have to mop up, which is minimal and no problem for multiple people, you can really only hit one Nanite Transformer / Transformer / Gate at a time making multiple target attacks less useful than their single target varients.
I don't find it a problem myself no. But the issue is that as an escort you can kill multiple things at once that way. Probes, possibly spheres, certainly you can do a lot of damage to the various unshielded things that guard gates and cubes and the like.

Quote:
You made some very good points but I disagree with some of them and i'll tell you why.

2 copies of EPtS. Ok sounds good on paper however; either you are getting spammed by shield neutralisers from multiple targets in which case this is a useless skill, or you are only getting hit by one every now and again. As shield neutraliser can miss (depending on your defence stat) a single hazard emitters is enough to keep it cleansed, transfer shield strength is a better shield heal and Engineering team is the most effective hull heal in the game as far as HP / Second goes.
If I keep 2x Tactical Team 1 I can run EPtE I (for when I am in seige mode) and EPtS I.
This is why you use 2x hazard emitters. At worst a 15s downtime when you are vulnerable to the shield neutralizer. And while the shield neutralizer can miss, cubes like to tractor you. With HE, you can clear it quickly when that happens. You seriously lack shield resists in that build, and 2x EPTS gives you full time resists, where TSS only gives 1/3 uptime by comparison.

And that is why no ET either, they do not offer resists, and tac team is much more important to have available for the borg boarding parties. ET putting TT on cooldown is much more of a problem for that issue alone.

Quote:
You suggested 2 dual cannons up front with 2 torpedo launchers. This means I have to get the enemy in my rear arc to use Target Shields Subsystems. Not great as it is and should be my opening beam attack. Ok I'll admit its not as useful as it once was given all the targets in STFs that have no shields anyway, but its very nice to be able to drop the shields of the Tactical Cubes long enough for the group to rip them apart. Saves a lot of time.
Quite right, but it shouldn't be a problem to swing your tail forward to hit with your rear beam. You're sacrificing a significant amount of firepower with a dual beam bank. You can also try target weapons 3 which can make cubes and tac cubes impotent.



Quote:
I will seriously consider your idea to take turrets in the rear. However I have found that C:RF really screws with the power drain on your ship. Might not be too bad with so many torpedo launchers though.

Please keep the feedback comming.
The problem is that those beams and torpedo in the rear are generally useless. I've never seen power drain be an actual problem, but then most all of my ships run with an EPS console.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
11-19-2011, 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxrocks
And that is why no ET either, they do not offer resists, and tac team is much more important to have available for the borg boarding parties. ET putting TT on cooldown is much more of a problem for that issue alone.
Bording parties are a pain in the butt thats for sure. It kinda sucks TT is the only way to get rid of them (except that DO who adds a proc to TSS).

I was never one who was big on shield resist stacking. It seems ineffective in STFs where you are hit insanely hard anyway. The resists on EPTS I are pretty low I'd rather not get hit at all by stacking a bit of extra defence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxrocks

This is why you use 2x hazard emitters. At worst a 15s downtime when you are vulnerable to the shield neutralizer. And while the shield neutralizer can miss, cubes like to tractor you. With HE, you can clear it quickly when that happens.
I ran double hazard emitters on my advanced escort for quite a while. I found that I never used the second one. I dont know why, weather its the reduced neutraliser spam, the fact I only agroed one or two ships at a time or something else.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxrocks
Quite right, but it shouldn't be a problem to swing your tail forward to hit with your rear beam. You're sacrificing a significant amount of firepower with a dual beam bank.
Unfortunately if you don't knock the shields down the first shot because of the way the target subsystems abilities work you can keep hitting them to get the effect. Cant do this with the beam in the rear. If it was possible to overlap a rear beam and front torps I'd try it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxrocks
The problem is that those beams and torpedo in the rear are generally useless. I've never seen power drain be an actual problem, but then most all of my ships run with an EPS console.
Mine too but I assure you you will notice it when you are firing 3 front energy weapons and 3 turrets. This is the reason I stopped taking turrets in the rear slots and eventually moved to 2 torp launchers up front. That and 7 torp vollies are cool.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
11-19-2011, 01:18 PM
You are flying an Escort, the type of ship with tremendous damage and maneuvering potential but it sounds like you are trying to fly it like a Cruiser? You want to use 2 dual beam banks up front with beam arrays in the rear which doesn't even work for broadsiding. This ship can equip dual heavy cannons and it's craziness not to take advantage of them.

Take the single beam array in the back for example. Given the wide firing arc all you really have to do is tilt your ship up or down, maybe turn to the side a few degrees and your beam will hit. If Target Subsystem Shields misses or fails you don't need to even fire that beam again for 45 seconds. Let a couple of DHCs and a couple of turrets keep the pressure on (those will be far more effective at reliably dropping shields over the course of 45 seconds.

EPtS1 is the best and cheapest resist in the game. This one ability grants you 30 seconds of resistance and enough power to allow you to put other power elsewhere (like in weapons and engines). Chaining two copies of EPtS and carefully minding a couple of copies of Hazard Emitters is going to serve you much better than Engineering Team. With two copies of Tactical Team (version 1 since all higher versions are a waste) you are at the very least boarding party free for 2/3rds of the time. What good is Engineering Team if the Borg are screwing with your cool downs?

You have speed on your side too. Assuming you won't be getting any support from people around you then you could still fly to 11km range and buy yourself a little breathing room.

I would pay a bit more attention to Foxrocks' suggestions if I were you. There is room for outside of the box thinking but going too far astray becomes less clever and more worthless.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:13 PM.