Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 169
It blows.

This is an interesting little thing from what we have for specs but its going to take a while to get because it requires T4 Shipyard.

Basically we have

Aquarius Destroyer vs Fleet Aquarius Destroyer

Requirements: 200K Fleet Marks (20K + 4 FSM for Fleet)
Fore/Aft Weapons: 4/2 (4/2)
Base Hull: 24000 (26400)
Shield Modifier: 0.66 (0.72)
Base Crew: 50 (50)
Base Turn: 16 (16)
Device Slots: 2 (2)

Boff Stations: Cmdr Tactical / Lt. Cmdr Tactical / Lt Eng / Lt Eng / Ensign Eng
Consoles 3x Eng / 4x Tac / 2x Sci (4x Eng / 4x Tac / 2x Sci)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Right away, I think Tank Escort but only 2 Aft Weapons is a bit weird for a T5 Ship.
Also has lower hull / shields than a Advanced Escort. Is this supposed to be even remotely good?

Last edited by sdkraust; 07-13-2012 at 06:02 PM.
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 275
# 2
07-13-2012, 05:56 PM
This is a BOP without the Universal BOFFs, 1 less weapon, and no cloak.

Completely worthless. There are better T4 (Cap-RA) ships.

Definitely not worth the VA crap.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,687
# 3
07-13-2012, 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakaishinlegion View Post
This is a BOP without the Universal BOFFs, 1 less weapon, and no cloak.

Completely worthless. There are better T4 (Cap-RA) ships.

Definitely not worth the VA crap.
This.


I hope no one buys it, so the devs will realize how much of a failure of a design it is.


It makes no sense at all to be a VA ship with those stats and its as Hakaishin says: a BoP with all the weaknesses and none of the benefits.

Wait scratch that, actually it has WORSE shields than a Hegh'ta, even the Fleet Version has worse shields than a Hegh'ta.


Easily one of the most overpriced sucker buys available.
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 275
# 4
07-13-2012, 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ussultimatum View Post
This.


I hope no one buys it, so the devs will realize how much of a failure of a design it is.


It makes no sense at all to be a VA ship with those stats and its as Hakaishin says: a BoP with all the weaknesses and none of the benefits.

Wait scratch that, actually it has WORSE shields than a Hegh'ta, even the Fleet Version has worse shields than a Hegh'ta.


Easily one of the most overpriced sucker buys available.
Sad part is, you know some PvE/RP queen out there will buy it.
Commander
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 369
# 5
07-13-2012, 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakaishinlegion View Post
Sad part is, you know some PvE/RP queen out there will buy it.
Yo Hakaishinlegion, I'm really happy for you, and Imma let you finish, but the B'Rel Refit was the greatest C-store flop of all time. OF ALL TIME!

Gotta agree that this thing sounds pointless, though.
Ensign
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 19
# 6
07-13-2012, 11:07 PM
Most of the low-tier retrofits are pointless; continuing the escort theme, compare both versions of the refit tier-2 fedscort to the free RA Patrol Escort.
----
Matthew/Shiduri@zekesulastin
Ensign
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7
# 7
07-15-2012, 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aethon3050 View Post
Yo Hakaishinlegion, I'm really happy for you, and Imma let you finish, but the B'Rel Refit was the greatest C-store flop of all time. OF ALL TIME!

Gotta agree that this thing sounds pointless, though.
A very interesting, and dubious, claim given that Cryptic/PWE (and Atari prior to that) were not overly keen on posting ANY of their C-store sales data.

More over, I see B'Rel refits -ALL THE TIME-, right up there with Kar'Fi and Guramba...

I have no doubt the B'Rel sold less units than the Dreadnought or the Armitage, but they weren't a flop...

The hyperbolic claim in no way covers for the statement being false...
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM.