Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,512
There's been a lot of complaining about the review system, which from what I understand, has not changed since the beginning of time.

Here's two things that I believe are both simple to implement and deals with our concerns:

  1. Default rating should be blank instead of 3 stars
  2. All ratings should be on the review list

Default Rating

Not all players change the rating before sending in a review for a mission. This is due ignorance, laziness or just forgetfulness. What ends up happening is a whole whack load of three stars, some which have a review stating "best mission evar!!". This especially hurts when a mission is spotlit because hordes of people who don't regularly play foundry missions show up and leave a bunch of 3 stars.

What I'm asking for, is to have the default start as blank, so when the player tries to press the button to leave a review without setting a rating a popup can appear telling the player to set it. To go even further the review drop down box can be on that pop up.

From a development standpoint I don't think this is a big challenge. Either have a null or "sixth" value as default, and when the player clicks the OK button check if that value is still there and pop up the warning if necessary.

Display all ratings

Right now only the reviews that have text in them show up in the review list. The only reason I can think of to hide reviews without text is to reduce clutter. At the same time as an author I would like to be able to see how many reviews and what ratings I got per day without meticulously recording that stuff daily. Also since a time stamp and @tag will be shown it will dissuade the mass 1 star drive-bys that some of us are suspicious about.

Implementing this change shouldn't be too hard in my mind because all the data is already stored in the database. It just needs to not hide ones without text. If the reviews are all gone though (and just increment numbers in the rating bar) then it won't be possible and will require a change in how reviews are stored. I have a feeling this isn't the case

Finally this is in regards to my rant post about the 1 star "no combat" thing, and development-wise is much less trivial. The ability to flag reviews would be nice. Then stupid reviews such as "no combat" when the mission states in capital letters that there is no combat can be removed or ignored by the rating system. How this actually works and who is getting paid to sort through these flagged reviews is a whole different ball game. This is more of a "would like to have" feature where-as the previous two are things that are more important.

Thanks for taking the time in reading this. I really like the Foundry and want to see it continue to improve. The suggestions I put forward are ways to help authors stay motivated, create a more accurate rating system and are easy to implement.

Zorbane
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 113
# 2
10-28-2012, 06:43 PM
Excellent suggestions Zorbane and very well put.

It shouldn't be very hard to do this, and would make the lives of the Foundry community a lot better, and happier

Please please please take the time to implement this Devs
*prepares the cookies in advance*
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 142
# 3
10-28-2012, 06:48 PM
we need a better system, but until then, this would work much more nicely.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,054
# 4
10-28-2012, 07:03 PM
Yes, my spotlight mission is now my lowest rated, simply because of all of the 3 stars. Not sure if a dev will read this thread, but here's hoping that one does. And here is hoping that he or she cares...
Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,912
# 5
10-28-2012, 07:19 PM
Devs don't seem to read this forum much. If they did, they would know that issues with the rating and search system have been brought up about a million times and about a million good ideas (and some not so good, your mileage may vary) have been suggested:

Such as here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star
or here: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...light=one-star

That's just the first six pages of all the ones I knew I'd find if I searched for the term "one-star." How did I know? Because one of those threads was mine.

So, they can put in disappearing NPCs, which they claimed was impossible and would break the Foundry, but they can't make any improvements to the rating and search system, the part of the Foundry that interacts with by far THE MOST players.

I fully support Zorbane's constructive ideas. Are they new, no, but they are worth repeating until something is done.
The Foundry Roundtable live Wednesdays at 7:30PM EST/4:30PM PST on twitch.tv/thefoundryroundtable
Forum Logic dictates that if the devs don't do what a poster wants, they therefor actively hate what that poster is advocating for.
Forum Logic =/= Real Logic
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 13,673
# 6
10-28-2012, 09:20 PM
I'm sure Zeronius has read at least one of those. But that they haven't made a statement, because they haven't made a decision on what, if anything, to do.
HAIL HYDRA!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I can haz joystick!
MMOs aren't charities. Corporations are supposed to make a profit. It's what they do.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:56 PM.