Lieutenant
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 81
# 1 Dreadnought Cruiser
03-24-2013, 06:37 PM
Anyone know if in the May update, it the Dreadnought will have saucer separation?
U.S.S. ENTERPRISE NCC 1701-Z
Malivistitisa Class (39-century Federation Class)
Career Officer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 12,373
# 2
03-24-2013, 06:39 PM
They said it would have saucer separation before the may update so idk.
The cake was delicious.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 32
# 3
03-24-2013, 06:41 PM
Because it makes sense for a saucer to separate from the hull when a spinal phaser lance is joining the two together right?

That ship needs more than a saucer Sep. It need lt com tac boff and a 4th tac console as well not to mention at least a 7 base turn rate.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 81
# 4
03-24-2013, 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by transam83 View Post
Because it makes sense for a saucer to separate from the hull when a spinal phaser lance is joining the two together right?

That ship needs more than a saucer Sep. It need lt com tac boff and a 4th tac console as well
Yea I agree since in STNG with one phaser hit it burned through the Klingon ship.
U.S.S. ENTERPRISE NCC 1701-Z
Malivistitisa Class (39-century Federation Class)
Career Officer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 12,373
# 5
03-24-2013, 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson2014 View Post
Yea I agree since in STNG with one phaser hit it burned through the Klingon ship.
It was like that originally but of course people started crying out for the nerf cannon cause they didn't like its awesome power.
The cake was delicious.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,463
# 6
03-24-2013, 08:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by transam83 View Post
Because it makes sense for a saucer to separate from the hull when a spinal phaser lance is joining the two together right?

That ship needs more than a saucer Sep. It need lt com tac boff and a 4th tac console as well not to mention at least a 7 base turn rate.
the barrel disengages from the firing chamber. makes sense was always suppose to if you noticed the ribbed detail on lance of the model that detailing was a retractable coupling for the separation
Lieutenant
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 32
# 7
03-25-2013, 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpgtx View Post
the barrel disengages from the firing chamber. makes sense was always suppose to if you noticed the ribbed detail on lance of the model that detailing was a retractable coupling for the separation
AH, thanks for that info. However, I still believe it needs more than just a saucer sep to be a viable "battleship" cruiser again.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,099
# 8
03-25-2013, 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by transam83 View Post
AH, thanks for that info. However, I still believe it needs more than just a saucer sep to be a viable "battleship" cruiser again.
Well there's the supposed upcoming fleet dreadnought, which could have more useful boff stations.
Previously Alendiak
Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
Republic Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,105
# 9
03-25-2013, 06:44 PM
Considering the current Gal-X has only 8 consoles (the fleet standard is 10), there is plenty of room for improvement.
______________________________________
Remember Me
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 11,107
# 10
03-25-2013, 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by orondis View Post
Well there's the supposed upcoming fleet dreadnought, which could have more useful boff stations.
It can't come soon enough.
http://i1151.photobucket.com/albums/o633/centersolace/189cux9khvl6ojpg_zpsca7ccff0.jpg
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:12 AM.