Go Back   Star Trek Online > Feedback > Federation Shipyards
Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,764
In commemmoration of this glorious meeting between two races in 50 years time, I'd propose we get our Fleet Dreadnought retrofit!

HP: 39,000
Shield mod: 1.0
Weapons: 4/4 and Lance, can equip dual cannons
Boffs: Comm Tac, LtComm Eng, LtComm Eng, Lt Sci
Consoles: 4/3/3
Turn: 6
INERTIAL RATING: 60
Crew: 1000

What this means is compared to the original dreadnought, the newer one accelerates faster and doesn't overshoot its target, while still turning like a Galaxy does in this game, allowing this ship to justify its 3rd nacelle for making it slightly more nimble without actually being more nimble.

The Boff layout is special for being the only Tactically-focused cruiser on the Federation side, and yet be still be able to support other lighter-armored ships.

It gives up any Fleet bonuses to hull and shield and gains a weird Sci console instead of Tac, diverting all that extra power into the 3rd nacelle for less inertia and a better boff layout. I see this role as better fitting for the Gal-X, as a Tactically-focused stealth-capable forward command cruiser of the 25th century.

What say you? I think this is a bit more balanced than some proposals out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt. Comm. Pion
What should I wish upon the endless universe;
To be able to smile and forgive everything;
That's right, if we light up the dream in our hearts without averting our eyes;
We should be able to walk whatever tomorrow comes...

I am V. Adm. Kha Yuung, and I approve of this message.

Last edited by khayuung; 04-08-2013 at 01:59 AM.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,253
# 2
04-08-2013, 04:43 AM
*The lance should have its accuracy re-looked at.
*I disagree with the console layout, I believe 5 / 2 / 3 would be better suited for a cruiser.
*Capable of saucer separation, if the player has the Saucer Separation console.
*Keep the old Boff layout, but change one of the Boff seats into a Universal.

I would add/change these on your proposal, but otherwise, I am all for it.

stardestroyer001, VA Explorers Fury | Email me for a Pro-Galaxy sig!
My Useful List of STO Forum Threads, Ship Builds & More! | My Forum Gripes
Foundry: A new series coming soon! | PvP: PvP Boot Camp, Notebook Project Almost Done!
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,119
# 3
04-08-2013, 05:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stardestroyer001 View Post
*The lance should have its accuracy re-looked at.
*I disagree with the console layout, I believe 5 / 2 / 3 would be better suited for a cruiser.
*Capable of saucer separation, if the player has the Saucer Separation console.
*Keep the old Boff layout, but change one of the Boff seats into a Universal.

I would add/change these on your proposal, but otherwise, I am all for it.
That's a horrible plan it needs 4 TAC and eng consoles and at least a Lt cmdr TAC boff slot.
The Emperor

Do not presume to have the capability to understand me for you see, I simply am.
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 632
# 4
04-08-2013, 05:07 AM
Hull hitpoints need to be 44k at least.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,216
# 5
04-08-2013, 05:23 AM
I say just add a tac console, buff its shield mod and hull as the rest, and call it a day.

Her boff layout is plenty workable. People just want her to be a different ship then she is.
I once again match my character. Behold the power of PINK!

Vice Admiral Space Orphidian Possiblities Wizard
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 820
# 6
04-08-2013, 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimmym View Post

Her boff layout is plenty workable. People just want her to be a different ship then she is.
is that your answer to every ship bo layout proposal, or you just don't known what your talking about?

ps: sorry for quadruple post thingy again
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,100
# 7
04-09-2013, 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimmym View Post
I say just add a tac console, buff its shield mod and hull as the rest, and call it a day.

Her boff layout is plenty workable. People just want her to be a different ship then she is.
Agree for the most part, although I do still think a Lt-Cmdr Tac would be of great benefit.

STAR TREK BATTLES - HIGH DPS PLAYERS NEED NOT APPY

Last edited by reyan01; 04-09-2013 at 04:38 AM.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,241
# 8
04-10-2013, 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimmym View Post
I say just add a tac console, buff its shield mod and hull as the rest, and call it a day.

Her boff layout is plenty workable. People just want her to be a different ship then she is.
People often forget the Galaxy Dreadnaught is still a galaxy class with some oomph added to it.

I think it only needs to be given the shield modifier of a sci ship, the hull of a cruiser and then have the lance weapon buffed up to use up both aux and wep power. Meaning aux adds as much damage as wep power when it is fired.
http://media.tumblr.com/160cacdb395f8340dac90864182ebe16/tumblr_inline_mx9yxhItkb1qg9pkt.jpg
Career Officer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 13
# 9
04-08-2013, 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by westx211 View Post
That's a horrible plan it needs 4 TAC and eng consoles and at least a Lt cmdr TAC boff slot.
It's a cruiser not an escort, 3 Tac consoles is fine. 44k HP, and the Lt Cmd slot is universal.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 820
# 10
04-08-2013, 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rellimie View Post
It's a cruiser not an escort, 3 Tac consoles is fine. 44k HP, and the Lt Cmd slot is universal.
it a tactical cruiser not a tanking healing cruiser, 4 tact console slot to support the lance IS fine.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.