Spock narrates the events that follow AFTER he goes back through time and establishes the alternative timeline. How can he know these things happen? It doesn't make sense.

We can't say that alternative timeline Spock returns to the future either, because he would be going to the future of the alternative timeline, as established by Back to the Future (well except for the Biff part).

I can't wrap my brain around how Spock narrates events that he cannot know about.

LOL I thought the same thing, but hey, no big deal. Cryptic probably wanted a big name to narrate events so I'm not too concerned by it.

Well, it is the actor Leonard Nimoy talking, not the character Spock...

Da bigga da name, da bigga da game.


...least, that the theory.

It's just marketing, don't let it get you down.

no, he makes referaces to himself as spock

Oh ok, then I am wrong here.

You guys are over thinking this. He's just narrating what he did and how we got to where we are... your trying to make it as if he is still in this universe, he's not, just narrating for us, like the opening of a movie, what events led up to where OUR story begins.

*Spoiler Alert*

Spock is the green Jesus.

Carl Sagan would probably agree.

The whole thing was just weird if you ask me A Spock that is no longer around telling what happened after he went in to a different reality, Not using Kirks name just my Friend when he was referring to the Undiscovered Country, and the whole lack of passion when reading it. They should have just had Spock do the space the final frontier bit, show your Miranda zipping along like a TV series intro , then use the cut scene of the Kittomer being attacked like an episode prelude.

My god it would have been so much better and so much simpler, I have to wonder what goes through developer’s heads sometimes.