Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,661
# 31
09-21-2013, 04:41 PM
Where there are billions of dollars to be made, can greed and litigation be far behind?
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 841
# 32
09-22-2013, 05:36 PM
Originally Posted by thecosmic1 View Post
First, not every ship name was important enough to get rechristened onto a new ship every few decades. Thus most ships in Starfleet don't have A, B, C designations.

As far as why that number range, it was discussed pre-Launch and had to do with CBS reserving specific numbers for future series or some-such, so these numbers were implemented by CBS to cause no conflict with anything official they might do at some point in the future.
Ah, that second point does make some sense. However, since there really is no more connection to canon Star Trek anymore, I can't see that as a reason to deny us that option.

As for the first point, I say "Says who?" Just because we haven't seen another ship with a letter designation doesn't mean there ARE none. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence (also an argument for why there should be COMMODORES in Starfleet, not Rear Admiral Lower Halves).
Once, I was simply called Mojo. Now, I'm forced into a new name, but don't be fooled, I'm the original STO Mojo!

Crafting, Exploration and Interaction as it should be:

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:45 AM.