# 11
01-31-2010, 03:58 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Danohk
Yes, but Star Trek has an enormous fanbase already. A deluge of non-MMO veterans really should be expected.
MoAr SeRv3Rz pLZ! |
Before some smart alec calls me a "doomsayer", I am totally on the fence.
# 12
01-31-2010, 03:59 PM
# 13
01-31-2010, 03:59 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The.Grand.Nagus
I am truly amazed that there are so many people trying to play STO before the official launch date that Crypitc's equiptement cant even handle it. This can be either incredibly good, or incredibly bad. If they get this fixed quick, it will mean that STO will possibly be a bigger sucess than anyone ever imagined and that Cryptic will have all the funds they ever need to provide all the content we want. If this DOESNT get fixed quick, STO's rep will be scarred from the beginning and its almost impossible for an MMO to shake a bad rep(see SWG). Either way, can anyone else believe(figure of speech) that there are really this many people pre-launch? I'm amazed
 |
but apprently, if you go off of the number of sales, usualy a certain % ever play at a time
and STO players are no where near playing by those basic rules
imagine if only 5% ever really played, but 50% showed up, what game out there do you think could handle that? i dont think ANY would, and thats probly something like whats happening(though not to that extent obviously)
i personaly see this as a good sign of things to come if this many people wanna play, but scary at the same time
# 14
01-31-2010, 04:00 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ulfhedjinn
That said, these are also the same reasons people should stop being so angry. It's like this is their first MMO or something.
|
# 15
01-31-2010, 04:01 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sumoben
The only thing I really am annoyed about so far is the patch notes.. or the lack of them.. :p But its not a big deal.
|
"server side changes where you are getting patched up to match the version number"
if there was anything worth telling us in them theyve always been good about it in the past
# 16
01-31-2010, 04:03 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thevedis
cryptic has stated the lack of usualy means one thing
"server side changes where you are getting patched up to match the version number" if there was anything worth telling us in them theyve always been good about it in the past |
I'm just one of those people who want to know anyway. :p
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:49 PM.