Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 51
09-09-2008, 10:26 AM
i would love to see more "behind the scenes".. it would be awsome
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 52
09-09-2008, 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yavin_Prime View Post
So to get to the bulk of the question, is there any need for writers in the game industry?
Many games have, at their core, a lot of plot, and good writing is essential to developing the kind of atmosphere you want your player to experience even if the player may not necessarily be reading text. And with games like RPGs (Assassin's Creed, The Witcher) and MMOs, that writing comes to the forefront as well in character interactions.

So definitely, yes.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 53 Thanks Kestrel
09-09-2008, 11:00 AM
For posting this interview, but I was wondering if anyone could tell us when we might get the next part of the story line?????
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 54
09-09-2008, 11:54 AM
Thanks for the bio, Al & company. It's always appreciated to get a better idea of the real people behind the product. In fact, this is an area where computer game development is far superior to pretty much any other kind of business -- how often do you get to meet the person who designed your car or your TV?

In particular, like others here I was really pleased at the final comments. I'm one of those who thinks this game will do best by serving both Star Trek fans and current MMORPG gamers in a balanced way, so it's pretty important when the lead designer makes it clear that in addition to offering deep gameplay, the IP will be respected.

Having said that... I guess I get to be the voice of caution.

Star Trek Online is going to be a massively multiplayer persistent-world roleplaying game based on an IP that makes the highly visible point that non-violence should always be the preferred option. So it raises a red flag for me when the lead designer offers the following comments:
Q: What part of Star Trek Online are you the most excited about working on?
A: Space combat. I am a combat system designer at heart, and I am very excited about the system we have worked out for space combat.

Q: What are your favorite episodes?
A: ... If I had to pick one, I guess I would have to say my favorite is "Sacrifice of Angels" (DS9), where Sisko retakes DS9; closely followed by "Yesterday's Enterprise" (TNG), where we see Tasha return, which eventually gives rise to Sela.
Star Trek most definitely has its smackdown moments. I consider it primarily a character-driven world, but there's certainly been a lot of phaser fire. (And I'm on record as endorsing the Federation philosophy of standing up for principles, even if that sometimes means violent conflict.)

That said, I'm a little concerned about how balanced gameplay in STO will be when the lead designer makes no bones about preferring destruction -- in Star Trek as well as in MMORPGs -- over constructive behavior.

I would have been happier personally if the lead designer for this particular game, with its particular IP, had been someone who was primarily interested and experienced in gameplay that's focused on character development, on world-building, on crafting, rather than on yet another set of rules for how to kill things. I'm not thrilled that the core design for non-combat content is in the hands of someone who by his own statements doesn't find that kind of gameplay to be the most exciting opportunity when designing an entire MMORPG based on a license that explicitly values non-combat solutions to problems. It's not a criticism of any kind of Al's experience or interests to say that I'm somewhat skeptical that he was the right person for this critical development role -- I'd rather the job had gone to someone who wasn't so combat-oriented.

On the plus side, he did mention preferring Picard over Kirk, so maybe there's some hope for him after all.

Seriously, though, none of the concerns outlined above mean that I'm angry or grumpy or having any kind of emotional reaction. Nor are my comments any kind of "attack" on Al or on Cryptic from which they need to be defended.

Nor am I criticizing the presence of combat in Star Trek Online. Combat is a part of Star Trek as well as being conventional MMORPG content, and on both of those grounds it needs to be baked into Star Trek Online's core design. Heck, I'm actually glad to hear that ship combat is being conceived as a deep tactical experience; that's exactly what I was hoping for. (Although I'm not satisfied yet that "tactical" is being correctly understood as requiring lots of environmental features, as opposed to just tying GUI buttons to character abilities and calling it "tactics." But the jury's still out on that one.)

What I'm saying is that the Star Trek IP has a uniquely strong emphasis on negotiation and science and cooperation over violence and destruction and competition. If the lead designer for this particular game is admittedly more energized by combat content, then those of us out here who believe that non-combat content needs to play an important role in this game need to politely express our hope that this aspect of the game will be given the enthusiastic high-level design attention that it deserves. And we need to step up with constructive suggestions for examples of broadly enjoyable non-combat content that can help achieve that balance between rules-based and world-based play that will best serve all of this game's likely subscribers.

I'd appreciate it if these comments were taken in the constructive and hopeful spirit in which I wrote them.

Thanks again to the folks at Cryptic for taking the time to say hello, and for letting us know that you hear our hopes for this product.

--Flatfingers
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 55
09-09-2008, 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatfingers View Post
Thanks for the bio, Al & company. It's always appreciated to get a better idea of the real people behind the product. In fact, this is an area where computer game development is far superior to pretty much any other kind of business -- how often do you get to meet the person who designed your car or your TV?

In particular, like others here I was really pleased at the final comments. I'm one of those who thinks this game will do best by serving both Star Trek fans and current MMORPG gamers in a balanced way, so it's pretty important when the lead designer makes it clear that in addition to offering deep gameplay, the IP will be respected.

Having said that... I guess I get to be the voice of caution.

Star Trek Online is going to be a massively multiplayer persistent-world roleplaying game based on an IP that makes the highly visible point that non-violence should always be the preferred option. So it raises a red flag for me when the lead designer offers the following comments:
Q: What part of Star Trek Online are you the most excited about working on?
A: Space combat. I am a combat system designer at heart, and I am very excited about the system we have worked out for space combat.

Q: What are your favorite episodes?
A: ... If I had to pick one, I guess I would have to say my favorite is "Sacrifice of Angels" (DS9), where Sisko retakes DS9; closely followed by "Yesterday's Enterprise" (TNG), where we see Tasha return, which eventually gives rise to Sela.
Star Trek most definitely has its smackdown moments. I consider it primarily a character-driven world, but there's certainly been a lot of phaser fire. (And I'm on record as endorsing the Federation philosophy of standing up for principles, even if that sometimes means violent conflict.)

That said, I'm a little concerned about how balanced gameplay in STO will be when the lead designer makes no bones about preferring destruction -- in Star Trek as well as in MMORPGs -- over constructive behavior.

I would have been happier personally if the lead designer for this particular game, with its particular IP, had been someone who was primarily interested and experienced in gameplay that's focused on character development, on world-building, on crafting, rather than on yet another set of rules for how to kill things. I'm not thrilled that the core design for non-combat content is in the hands of someone who by his own statements doesn't find that kind of gameplay to be the most exciting opportunity when designing an entire MMORPG based on a license that explicitly values non-combat solutions to problems. It's not a criticism of any kind of Al's experience or interests to say that I'm somewhat skeptical that he was the right person for this critical development role -- I'd rather the job had gone to someone who wasn't so combat-oriented.

On the plus side, he did mention preferring Picard over Kirk, so maybe there's some hope for him after all.

Seriously, though, none of the concerns outlined above mean that I'm angry or grumpy or having any kind of emotional reaction. Nor are my comments any kind of "attack" on Al or on Cryptic from which they need to be defended.

Nor am I criticizing the presence of combat in Star Trek Online. Combat is a part of Star Trek as well as being conventional MMORPG content, and on both of those grounds it needs to be baked into Star Trek Online's core design. Heck, I'm actually glad to hear that ship combat is being conceived as a deep tactical experience; that's exactly what I was hoping for. (Although I'm not satisfied yet that "tactical" is being correctly understood as requiring lots of environmental features, as opposed to just tying GUI buttons to character abilities and calling it "tactics." But the jury's still out on that one.)

What I'm saying is that the Star Trek IP has a uniquely strong emphasis on negotiation and science and cooperation over violence and destruction and competition. If the lead designer for this particular game is admittedly more energized by combat content, then those of us out here who believe that non-combat content needs to play an important role in this game need to politely express our hope that this aspect of the game will be given the enthusiastic high-level design attention that it deserves. And we need to step up with constructive suggestions for examples of broadly enjoyable non-combat content that can help achieve that balance between rules-based and world-based play that will best serve all of this game's likely subscribers.

I'd appreciate it if these comments were taken in the constructive and hopeful spirit in which I wrote them.

Thanks again to the folks at Cryptic for taking the time to say hello, and for letting us know that you hear our hopes for this product.

--Flatfingers
Just as long as some punk that plays 80 hours a week cant kick my butt with me stadning no chance of kicking his since i can't play 80 hours a week, i'll be happy.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 56
09-09-2008, 12:54 PM
I am encouraged a tiny bit by this statement:
STO will be the unique experience that you have been waiting for

And I lose that encouragement when I take a look at this one:
I am a combat system designer at heart

A combat oriented lead designer scares me a little. So I am on the fence again.

I do agree that I am making points out of context. The statement by itself worries me. I don't want a game that is focused on combat. Combat should be no more then 25% of the experience in my opinion because that fits with canon. I worry the Cryptic believes that in order to make it fun, that they feel they were forced to make a game that is predominantly combat. I will be more than happy to see a game that allows for any play style to be fun and achieve the highest levels and obtain the best gear. Other games seem to reserve the best for those who have a certain play style. I don't want that to happen here. A full time explorer capt. should be able to get all the best stuff. Just as a full time PvP capt should.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 57
09-09-2008, 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatfingers View Post
Thanks for the bio, Al & company. It's always appreciated to get a better idea of the real people behind the product. In fact, this is an area where computer game development is far superior to pretty much any other kind of business -- how often do you get to meet the person who designed your car or your TV?

In particular, like others here I was really pleased at the final comments. I'm one of those who thinks this game will do best by serving both Star Trek fans and current MMORPG gamers in a balanced way, so it's pretty important when the lead designer makes it clear that in addition to offering deep gameplay, the IP will be respected.

Having said that... I guess I get to be the voice of caution.

Star Trek Online is going to be a massively multiplayer persistent-world roleplaying game based on an IP that makes the highly visible point that non-violence should always be the preferred option. So it raises a red flag for me when the lead designer offers the following comments:
Q: What part of Star Trek Online are you the most excited about working on?
A: Space combat. I am a combat system designer at heart, and I am very excited about the system we have worked out for space combat.

Q: What are your favorite episodes?
A: ... If I had to pick one, I guess I would have to say my favorite is "Sacrifice of Angels" (DS9), where Sisko retakes DS9; closely followed by "Yesterday's Enterprise" (TNG), where we see Tasha return, which eventually gives rise to Sela.
Star Trek most definitely has its smackdown moments. I consider it primarily a character-driven world, but there's certainly been a lot of phaser fire. (And I'm on record as endorsing the Federation philosophy of standing up for principles, even if that sometimes means violent conflict.)

That said, I'm a little concerned about how balanced gameplay in STO will be when the lead designer makes no bones about preferring destruction -- in Star Trek as well as in MMORPGs -- over constructive behavior.

I would have been happier personally if the lead designer for this particular game, with its particular IP, had been someone who was primarily interested and experienced in gameplay that's focused on character development, on world-building, on crafting, rather than on yet another set of rules for how to kill things. I'm not thrilled that the core design for non-combat content is in the hands of someone who by his own statements doesn't find that kind of gameplay to be the most exciting opportunity when designing an entire MMORPG based on a license that explicitly values non-combat solutions to problems. It's not a criticism of any kind of Al's experience or interests to say that I'm somewhat skeptical that he was the right person for this critical development role -- I'd rather the job had gone to someone who wasn't so combat-oriented.

On the plus side, he did mention preferring Picard over Kirk, so maybe there's some hope for him after all.

Seriously, though, none of the concerns outlined above mean that I'm angry or grumpy or having any kind of emotional reaction. Nor are my comments any kind of "attack" on Al or on Cryptic from which they need to be defended.

Nor am I criticizing the presence of combat in Star Trek Online. Combat is a part of Star Trek as well as being conventional MMORPG content, and on both of those grounds it needs to be baked into Star Trek Online's core design. Heck, I'm actually glad to hear that ship combat is being conceived as a deep tactical experience; that's exactly what I was hoping for. (Although I'm not satisfied yet that "tactical" is being correctly understood as requiring lots of environmental features, as opposed to just tying GUI buttons to character abilities and calling it "tactics." But the jury's still out on that one.)

What I'm saying is that the Star Trek IP has a uniquely strong emphasis on negotiation and science and cooperation over violence and destruction and competition. If the lead designer for this particular game is admittedly more energized by combat content, then those of us out here who believe that non-combat content needs to play an important role in this game need to politely express our hope that this aspect of the game will be given the enthusiastic high-level design attention that it deserves. And we need to step up with constructive suggestions for examples of broadly enjoyable non-combat content that can help achieve that balance between rules-based and world-based play that will best serve all of this game's likely subscribers.

I'd appreciate it if these comments were taken in the constructive and hopeful spirit in which I wrote them.

Thanks again to the folks at Cryptic for taking the time to say hello, and for letting us know that you hear our hopes for this product.

--Flatfingers
I couldn't have said any better.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 58
09-09-2008, 01:09 PM
It is good to know that the lead designer is a fellow Star Trek fan and will do his best to do well by us. I am especially glad that they are goin to work on the combat system to make it more like Star Trek instead of a dogfighting sim and that they are going to try and make the scale right, it is weird to see a Defiant being the same size as an Intrepid or a Galaxy.

It is good that the designer has a bat'leth, it means that he will do the Klingons right.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 59
09-09-2008, 02:04 PM
Wow, I am amazed by the level of dedication and detial that they team at Cryptic is putting into STO, the space combat sounds amazing and very true to the core of Star Trek. Keep up the good work and keep the info flowing. You guys rock
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 60
09-09-2008, 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outpost_31 View Post
I couldn't have said any better.
I agree that from the federation perspective force is always a last resort and I am interested to see if gameplay will change drastically depending on which race a player chooses to be. I think that exploring beyond the federation perspective will be very interesting, especially once updates with other races are relased.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 AM.