Go Back   Star Trek Online > Feedback > PvP Gameplay

Thread Tools Display Modes
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 21
02-14-2010, 12:24 PM
I think the key is the distinction between being light on content/elements and being light on those things and having much of it being ill conceived and poorly implemented. I don't object so much to Klingons not having the same volume of PvE as the Feds, though I think at a minimum an MMO should have at least two complete factions especially when the main faction has only one content path for all its classes/players. What gets me is that even shorting Klingons on PvE the PvP stuff is so terrible, and so poorly conceived at that.

When you consider the Klingon state of things STO is simply a game with one bit of content (the Fed stuff) where most MMOs have exponentially more content. And that being the case, it is all the more reason to be shocked at how poorly the Klingon side of things is. Even if they didn't manage to get Klingon PvE on par with the Feds how could they go to live with the psuedo content of PvP so poorly implemented?

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:22 AM.