Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1031
04-24-2011, 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PerRock View Post
probably the easiest way to do them is have them turn on for 'Emergency Power to engines' and maybe the attack patterns.

petet
Or have them turn on when the saucer separates on the Galaxy Refit. Which would fit early TNG canon.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1032 Class-f
04-25-2011, 02:47 AM
The upper fairing of the Class-F needs reducing in size by atleast 75% its way too big at present
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1033
04-28-2011, 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamingbadger View Post
The upper fairing of the Class-F needs reducing in size by atleast 75% its way too big at present
Pics or it didn't happen. :p
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1034
04-29-2011, 02:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelSilhouette View Post
Pics or it didn't happen. :p


Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1035
04-29-2011, 03:46 AM
Not sure if this is the place, but I've notice that the added Borg fx from the borg set doesn't do anything with the Borg engine 'armor/cage' that normally sits on the right nacelle, when the player is in gamma mode of the Prometheus.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1036
04-29-2011, 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamingbadger View Post


I'm not noticing a dramatic difference, any where. It helps if you take pictures from similar angles with adequate lighting.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1037
04-29-2011, 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelSilhouette View Post
I'm not noticing a dramatic difference, any where. It helps if you take pictures from similar angles with adequate lighting.
sorry you cant see the difference i can...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1038
04-29-2011, 06:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelSilhouette View Post
I'm not noticing a dramatic difference, any where. It helps if you take pictures from similar angles with adequate lighting.
Maybe it's the shuttle's name and base of operation designation? Also the ridge across the top is "broke" harder where the original has more of a soft radius. But that is just nit picking.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1039
04-29-2011, 07:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by piwright42 View Post
But that is just nit picking.
You're safe to pick nits in this thread, that's its entire purpose of being.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1040
04-29-2011, 06:20 PM
if you look at the photo from the remastered series, the height of the fairing is larger at the back than the front. in the model for STO its constant, they have taken the height from the back and used it all the way through leaving it too big at the front.

The shuttle name in the right place would be nice too
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:21 PM.