Go Back   Star Trek Online > Feedback > The Art of Star Trek Online
Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 31
07-19-2011, 05:21 PM
Not just no, but an emphatic HELL NO. It's hideous, it's worthless, and more over, I want to take a sledgehammer to the skull of whatever idiot came up with it. Thank you, and good night.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 32
07-19-2011, 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koppenflak
Can we get the Battlestar Galactica in the game as well then?

I mean, we all know the Constitution class was seen as an equally blurry spaceship in the Colonial Fleet, right?

That must make the Constitution's presence in BSG absolute, irrefutable canon.
I'm not sure where you're going with this since... unfortunately...the Yeager was in many episodes as a background shot to DS9.

Love it or hate it, its still a canon ship. No matter how much it makes my eyes bleed. Or the nightmares it causes.

I would be interested to see if the Capn could make it look sweet, instead of a Frankenstein monster. Just out of morbid curiosity if nothing else.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 33
07-19-2011, 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hravik
I'm not sure where you're going with this since... unfortunately...the Yeager was in many episodes as a background shot to DS9.

Love it or hate it, its still a canon ship. No matter how much it makes my eyes bleed. Or the nightmares it causes.

I would be interested to see if the Capn could make it look sweet, instead of a Frankenstein monster. Just out of morbid curiosity if nothing else.
yet again the Millinum Falcon appered in first contact, should we include the falcon in STO?

sometimes ships in a background aren't ment to be brought to the foreground and examined up close
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 34
07-20-2011, 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianDavion View Post
yeah I'll pass, if this monstrocity gets in before the ambassador, Norway, steamrunner or any of the multitude of REAL canon ships I'll be annoyed
You know why the Norway isn't in the game? Because it was an ultra-low polygon model with just enough detail it looked ship-like while swooshing across the screen. And they got rid of it, because it was a hack-job throwaway model. The Yeager, though ugly as sin, has just as much a reason to be in game as it does.

That said, I HATE the Yeager. It's inelegant, it doesn't have any of the classic lines of the Starfleet ships, and it looks slapdash. While I wouldn't mind a few of the Wolf kitbashes making it into the game, we need progressive ship ship design, not regressive ship design. We need the good capn to roll out some nifty, new ships.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 35
07-20-2011, 02:40 AM
OP why do you hate star trek?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 36
07-20-2011, 02:51 AM
I can't believe that's cannon. O_O
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 37
07-20-2011, 03:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by minionsoldier View Post
OP why do you hate star trek?
lol, i dont the ship just appeals to me even if it is ugly.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 38
07-20-2011, 04:07 AM
Aren't there alerady enough ugly buckets to fly around for you?
Envoy, Noble, Dervish, Hermes, Gryphon, Maelstrom, Hephaestus, IMPERIAL, Gallant, Quasar, Rapier, Ushaan, Comet and Shikar.
There is no need to waste Captain Logan's time on that ugly thig. IMHO.


Live long and prosper.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 39
07-20-2011, 11:04 AM
even it is an urgly looking ship they can have it at DS9 just protect the station like in the show.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 40
07-20-2011, 11:10 AM
No, I don't want to see the deformed offspring of an Intrepid and Maquis Raider
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 AM.