Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 21
07-23-2011, 12:37 PM
It really should spend the next 6 months or so exclusively as a unique ship for story missions and big events. Keep the suspense and build it up more by flaunting it without letting us have it yet.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 22
07-23-2011, 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvs5191 View Post
Cruiser pilots - If the Ent-F/Odyssey has an LtC Universal, will you continue to fly your Star/Assault Cruisers?
No, be it universal or Sci.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 23
07-23-2011, 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvs5191 View Post
Cruiser pilots - If the Ent-F/Odyssey has an LtC Universal, will you continue to fly your Star/Assault Cruisers?
I find it very hard to give up the double Enginering Team 3 setup. I might try it out. It might depend on other stats. Turn rate is less important for Cruisers, but low maneuverability still makes it hard to keep in range of all allies (and change course towards them if they are not.)

I will certainly try the F out.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 24
07-23-2011, 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MustrumRidcully View Post
I find it very hard to give up the double Enginering Team 3 setup. I might try it out. It might depend on other stats. Turn rate is less important for Cruisers, but low maneuverability still makes it hard to keep in range of all allies (and change course towards them if they are not.)

I will certainly try the F out.
hint: era doesn't even run dual et3s
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 25
07-23-2011, 02:52 PM
Quote:
hint: era doesn't even run dual et3s


Pah, what does Era know anyway. :p
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 26
07-23-2011, 03:09 PM
What do you think of giving it a BOff layout similar to the carrier?

Cmdr and Lt eng, LtC sci and tac.

I don't think I've seen that setup posted anywhere but it would fit with the flavor of being able to handle any situation.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 27
07-23-2011, 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crow_Splat
What do you think of giving it a BOff layout similar to the carrier?

Cmdr and Lt eng, LtC sci and tac.

I don't think I've seen that setup posted anywhere but it would fit with the flavor of being able to handle any situation.
Already been suggested, and don't you think that would be bloody overpowered?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 28
07-23-2011, 03:13 PM
I posted that up earlier. Some people were up in arms, however, justifying that this kind of layout justified slow-as-molasse handling and maneuverability.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 29
07-23-2011, 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thamupp View Post
hint: era doesn't even run dual et3s
http://myfacewhen.com/2/
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 30
07-23-2011, 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gx4th View Post
Already been suggested, and don't you think that would be bloody overpowered?
No. Especially if it had a similar turn rate as the carrier. Now if it handled like a defiant then it would be rediculously OP.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 PM.