Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1 welcome to a new thread
07-26-2011, 11:40 PM
enterprise f

so what do you think? boff layout.?

i bet its cmdr engi and ltc sci..

but we'll see i guess.

and how could this impact pvp gameplay (good enough.............)

i dunno this thread just came to my mind.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
07-26-2011, 11:56 PM
edit - nevermind. tried to help.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
07-27-2011, 12:03 AM
This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Atari Community Rules and Policies ~WishStone
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4
07-27-2011, 12:14 AM
then you will eventually get banned and you wont be able to say anything again. is it worth it?

your choice but im trying to keep you on the forums here.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
07-27-2011, 12:21 AM
in keeping with cryptic tradition of making ever new federation ship even more uber than the last im guessing,

Commander Engineering
Lieutenant Commander Universal
Lieutenant Science
Lieutenant Tactical
Ensign Engineering

how it could impact PVP?

hhhmn it will likely make all other cruisers obsolete just like the MVAM did to escorts and fit nicely alongside the intrepid and mvam to give the already underpowered federation an edge against those overpowered Klingon and their BOP's and carriers that are just so overpowered .....

oh btw thamupp you win the internets, i award you 10 points for persistence
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
07-27-2011, 01:06 AM
Well, lets talk about it.

What does everyone here think for PvP balance. Is a cmdr engi and ltc sci.. fed cruiser going too far... what about a universal slot ala the Nebula.

I think if it ends up with something similer to a reverse engi / sci slot to the carrier it would have to have some trade offs.... and what trade offs could they make that wouldn't upset our pve playing frineds. I mean if it turns worse then a star cruiser they will be annoyed... if it has less hull they will complain how the ship of the line wouldn't not have less hull bla bla.... so what is the trade for a sweet boff layout ?

Or does it get a standard layout and make something else obsolete.

All valid PvP topics are they not ?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 7
07-27-2011, 04:06 AM
i just peed a little
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 8
07-27-2011, 04:09 AM
Its about the upcomming fed ship and how it could impact pvp. I dont see how this is not a valid topic to disscuss.

Oh and revo, while i appricate it its not needed.



This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Atari Community Rules and Policies ~WishStone
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
07-27-2011, 04:53 AM
screw Ent F. I want to lug around the quadrant in a gently used Ambassador Class. I tried to salvage one from Wolf 359 but all i found were constitution class hulks. Weird
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 10
07-27-2011, 04:58 AM
I still think this would be the ideal setup:

Cmdr Eng
LtC Eng

Lt Tac

En Sci

Lt Uni

It would give plenty of flexibility for all 3 professions and give a potential cruiser setup (other than Excel) where cannons are more viable (normally youd have to run CRF, and would have no room for an AP)

It could also mirror the SC, and it could have the heaviest Eng BO setup.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 AM.