Thats what I'm talking about. (You cannot change the Bible )
The OPVP rules are the best thing we have to control never fixed STO issues but they must be changable.
Imo allowing but controlling FAW by keeping restrictions to ships (maybe even forbid beam escorts for that purpose) would be another way to get over the superior healing. Of course this needs some testing.
Till now the thread shows, a majority doesnt think the SS 3 restriction is fine how it is. Or is this just my reading?
Control FAW with only a number of ships having it pehaps yes.
And the ppl who want SS 3 is FSers and we all know their space tactics :p
The last 2 were run by QEW, and EVERYONE enjoyed them. The extend fiasco was 3 tournaments ago, the restrictions were a little too tight on that one, but to be fair, it was the first one and we all learned from it, just like we have learned from ours. The fourth one run by RisaRadio will be even better.
The rules have ALL come from a joint effort among the community. Questions have been asked, people have answered, put forward more suggestions and that is ONLY way the rules have come about. We didn't sit down and find rules that suited us, neither did TSI. They are community set rules. If you want to argue for or against them, fine, do so in next feedback thread. Simply stating you won't play because you couldn't make up the rules is being rather childish.
Sign up, have some fun and provide some feed back if you want things changing.
personally....i don't care what some guys from a known QQ channel have to say..which skills are allowed or not:p
i expect you guys asking for a tac team ban for the next tourny...so cloaked ambushs are easier lol!
lol no you have for ex: SS1 and SS2 to deal with that
Originally Posted by Cutter.Slade
and i had to laugh about this one:
SERIOUSLY^^...after the final...15:1....those guys who lost complained about EXTEND SHIELDS so badly.....even about EXTEND 1..lmao
and the raging lasted for days..here one infamous quote:
"Blah blah blah, you and everyone else knows its garbage. You knew extend shields were garbage. Yet you choose to run it"
Therefore your team is not on the cheese free list, simple as that....good day!
and in the other event one klingon player complained about scramble 1....!
Eh cutter you must have been playing to much dabo again lol that statement is from the TSI turney where you could have 3 ES but only 2 PSW to clear it. Im talking about Opvp Turney
1 klingon complaining about SS1 oh well I heard ppl are complaining about goombas aswell
Last I checked, QewQew got smacked 15-1. You want screenies?
Anyway, thanks for proving my point. You lost so the QewQew begins.
Assuming youre talking about TSI funday:
Thats fine, and we went to their vent and explained our side of it. They agreed the restrictions for Klings were too tight, forcing us to play like feds with inferior ships - and before we took over hosting they adjusted the rules to loosen the klingon ship selection up.
Why? Because we actually talked to them and gave feedback, instead of being little girls on the forums and accusing them of bending the rules to their team setup.
you guys are the only ones having to boost your ego when you "own" a random fun setup 15:13
do we brag about a win against tsi when they are a 5 man team but on a fun setup?no...just no
did we brag about the "ownage" 15:1 victory over you guys playing your lame NOT_TSI setup?no....
gg simple as that
*edit* how are you mr.tide?
No, what you did do was talk **** (smack) about our fleet the night before in Organized PVP about how we lose (when we dont) yadayadyada and then get owned by 4 Galaxy X's and a Pug the next night when on a full five man setup.
You would think a team would learn not to talk **** to a superior team after the KT beating we gave you, but nope. You started it again, and you paid for it, again.