Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 11
03-13-2012, 08:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroniusRex
[*]The bridges for both the Bortasqu’ and the Oddyssey Advanced Cruiser are now fully functional and ready to be seen.
[/list]
Will the bridge come with each ship? or only with the fat pack?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 12
03-13-2012, 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashur1
Removing the Brace for Impact power to prevent issues is all nice and well, but does the Jemmie shield get anything new to compensate for the loss ?
Same question.

And will say that the old bug definitely disappeared with the patch.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 13
03-13-2012, 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparhawk_Mike
Really? A +1 to turn rate was considered excessive? The set bonus was prety meh to begin with.

Edit: for reference the bonus is now + .5 turn rate on the set bonus.
I hate this change.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 14
03-13-2012, 08:57 PM
Well, anything to make the new ships less OP is probably good, but the +1 turnrate was never really considered excessive by anyone.

More pertinent balance issues involve sensor analysis and the fact that these ships have an extra console slot.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 15
03-13-2012, 08:57 PM
Edit: stupid laggy forum made me double post.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 16
03-13-2012, 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solsticewolf View Post
Will the bridge come with each ship? or only with the fat pack?
All of them.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 17
03-13-2012, 09:05 PM
The Type 6 hull isn't available on the +1. I hope that's not on purpose. :p
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 18
03-13-2012, 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashur1
Removing the Brace for Impact power to prevent issues is all nice and well, but does the Jemmie shield get anything new to compensate for the loss ?
It was never intended in the first place and you want them to compensate for the "loss"?!?! It should have never been there to begin with...

Sheesh...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 19
03-13-2012, 10:20 PM
ya dont nerf the turn rate as thats the main draw of the set
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 20
03-13-2012, 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-A-T-H-F-I-N-D-E-R
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparhawk_Mike
Really? A +1 to turn rate was considered excessive? The set bonus was prety meh to begin with.

Edit: for reference the bonus is now + .5 turn rate on the set bonus.
I hate this change.
As do I. I get that they're trying to say these ships are "huge" and therefore should turn like slugs, but c'mon they're also supposed to represent the latest in tech. Surely they would have found a way to give them respectable turn rates.

The idea that I could at least get a decent turn rate if I chose to Pay-to-Win made it at least tolerable. +1 Turn Rate bringing the ships to 7 and 6.5? Meh. That was not as impressive an incentive as I'd hoped, but might have been doable. But now +0.5 for $50?

This is a huge turn off for me.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 PM.