Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 85
Noticed this today:

Who wants to bet, if the principles of this research ever yield a product, what it will be called?

Join Date: Aug 2008 -------------------- My oldest post (that I can find)
Location: Houston, TX ------------------ Former Cryptic User #11424

Stop the easily abused and unfair auto-silence "feature"!
Republic Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,286
# 2
09-08-2012, 09:56 PM
Actually, if this new theory is correct, then there would be no need for Heisenberg Compensators because Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle would no longer be valid.
@Commadore_Bob; Joined Jul 2009; That post count + 20,000
Click on my sig to view Family-Friendly Youtube Videos
I also now have a logo shop. Click my sig!
Click here to watch my STO play-through video series.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 480
# 3
09-10-2012, 03:19 PM
Actually, according to the articles I've read (as opposed to the hyperbolic headlines usually accompanying same and written by drips who understand little about the very subjects they're expounding upon) they haven't actually invalidated Heisenberg. His principle still stands. What they found was that they could measure an event and have what the researchers considered a negligible impact on the particle/event being measured. Not "no impact" but "negligible impact". The impact was sufficiently low that they could then make a calculation that has a HIGH probability of being accurate. But it's still a guess, no matter how educated or informed a guess it might be. It is still impossible to know, with absolute certainty, both the speed and position of a particle... and always will be.
ZOE: "Sir! You paid money for this?... on purpose??"

KIRK: "Excuse me... what does God need with a starship?"

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.