Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,018
# 41
10-14-2012, 10:20 AM
i understand what you're saying , i know the galaxy doesnt protrude more past its saucer size , bit i personally dislike that in starships , i prefer the consitution school of thought , where the nacelles are visable above the saucer , rather than below like the galaxy and said nacelles are held further away from the engineering section
12th Fleet
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,333
# 42
10-15-2012, 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yreodred View Post
[font="Verdana"][color="SandyBrown"]I don't know about you, but for me the overall shape of a Galaxy Class looks more compact than a Sovereign or Odyssey for example.
A car analogy? Now you dissappoint me...
Is that all, your attempt to annoy me (again) failed hard.
1) I wasn't trying to annoy you

2) What the Sovereign has in length, the Galaxy has in width (and in spades) and what 43 decks? You might have an argument for the Nebula being compact, but not the Galaxy.

3) As far as car analogies, I worked for the automotive industry for over 20 years, it comes with the territory.

Last edited by whamhammer1; 10-16-2012 at 06:17 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 PM.