Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,028
# 191
11-14-2012, 11:25 AM
Originally Posted by hypl View Post
As they say, "Sex sells."

Excluding ditzy T'Bosom there, it's a nice picture.

Originally Posted by reginamala78 View Post
Rage? This is full-on mockery. Admittedly, T'Its is probably more accurate to what ya see running around ESD, but still...... *chuckles*

Originally Posted by sumghai View Post
I'm not sure I agree with you there, I thought T'Boobs had a resemblance to Kirsten Stewart.

I think we need a player poll to choose the name for our new Icon. These three names should be amongst the choices.

STO Forum:
Where the Human Adventure is Just Beginning!

Where you can also catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
Give the Art Team time to fix the K't'inga << Link
Exploring STO Since Pavement.
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,933
# 192
11-14-2012, 11:28 AM
Y'know, I am kinda shocked...not about the picture itself, but that it didn't happen sooner. Let's be honest, we've all learned what PWE is like, it's rather amazing it wasn't earlier, the season 7 release was a good job.

I'm curious, were there changes for previous seasons, however briefly, of the backround? If there were, I do believe they were changed back, so our ample elfish...Romulan...Vulcan...whatever species captain, may only be here for a little while.

I really don't care though about the new pic, I neither like nor dislike it. It is a clear, blatant attempt at being a sexual image (regardless) of what Cryptic or PWE would say, but how long would many of us here would look at all, before moving onto another page that you were going to anyways?

Aside from the cleavage, I am not surprised she's holding only a basic phaser. With the costs of everything, at least she can afford that.

Not trying to de-rail the thread of course. Handsome Phaser Guy gonna be the new 'Where's Sulu?'
Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 69
# 193
11-14-2012, 11:32 AM
The arguement that there were "sexy ladies with revealing clothing" in the TV and movie series just doesn't hold water in this case.

Show me one photo of a non STO female Starfleet uniform with a plunging neckline? You can't because they don't exist unless it's fan fiction.

Off duty clothing was a different story, but that's off duty or a special case like a councellor who isn't wearing a uniform while on duty. Seven was never a starfleet officer and never wore a uniform. I never watched Enterprise so I can't comment on the Vulcan.

Feds have been very consistent with women in uniform, skirts are okay just like some modern dress uniforms, but never anything like this. And to to it off she's obviously a vulcan.....the very embodyment of conservatism!

Mirror universe and Klingons/Orions are a different story. I wouldn't have a problem with an almost naked Orion shooting a disruptor, becasue to them sexuality is a weapon to be weilded to gain power over their adversaries!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 69
# 194
11-14-2012, 11:39 AM
Originally Posted by kagasensei View Post
It's more 'bout how differently men and women are portrayed. Men do not seem to be required to show off anything to be considered aesthetically pleasing :p )
That's not true. Look at the Avengers poster, the one that everyone went nuts over becasue of the gratuitous but shot.

All of the dudes are in what I'd call the "power pose" which accents the male form (tall, broad shoulders, flat stomachs) and projects the types of qualities women like:

physical strength and fitness,
and most important - wealth!

Men are objectified just as much as women, but in different ways.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,926
# 195
11-14-2012, 11:51 AM
Can I download a wallpaper centered on that girl with her legs showing? Cryptic? At least put it in the C-store please! (This is a semi-joke statement)

She looks cute enough, though from careful observation her skin seems to hold a pinkish and not greenish tint. Maybe a hybrid. Who has red blood, not the usual green.

To be honest, i think the previous guy should have been kept on the page alongside the new vulcan girl. To keep both genders of the playerbase happy.

As it was pointed out, he was handsome and athletic. Now a female is pretty and athletic.

I actually think sexism is a word that means :
"This woman looks way better then how I look. I am so jealous. I want to look like that, but I'm damn ugly. So I'm going to blame the picture of a pretty female to feel better about looks that could scare a cave troll away."

I just hope such people don't act so hostile against a real woman with good looks. Luckily here its a victimless act of rudeness, as the girl in question is just a bunch of pixels, and thus has no feelings at all.
Since when is it a crime to dress fashionably?
I mean some comments were looked like as if Marcy D'arcy wrote them at one of Al Bundy's playboy models.

And what is wrong with this? Nothing. An attractive female cover-girl replaced the handsome cover-boy. While the loss of one is regrettable, faulting the replacement is hardly constructive.

I do get it that her gun looks a bit odd, perhaps another type of pistol would have been a better idea.

Last edited by tpalelena; 11-14-2012 at 11:57 AM.
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 43
# 196
11-14-2012, 11:55 AM
Originally Posted by tachyonharmonic View Post
Wait are you really trying to justify a supposedly sexist change by saying "Hey it's okay, Star Trek was always sexist before!" ?

Just because it was sexist before, doesn't mean it still has to be sexist now. Just sayin'.

Originally Posted by azniadeet View Post
Wait? Kira was supposed to be a sex symbol?

LOL she sure as hell wasn't wearing a burkha, and then you also have her Intendant character. Her little fling with Mirror Ezri was quite interesting.

I do find it funny people bothered about what they are wearing or not wearing. If I were a woman, I would be more concerned about their roles in the game. Are women in the game given positions of power, authority, and intellect? Are they able to be in front line combat? They are not relegated to support roles such medicine, secretarial...etc.

Star Trek has no shortage of scantily clad women, but it was a trailblazer for women's roles on TV, it provided a lot of strong female characters.

When I created my KDF female toon, I really tried not to create a bimbo. I tried to model her a little after Grace Jones. That way she kind of looks like she knows how to operate a disruptor or command a ship.


Last edited by tejanahawk; 11-14-2012 at 12:08 PM.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 516
# 197
11-14-2012, 11:58 AM
Too much Attack Pattern Beta in here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Needs more female relief ops ensign.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,005
# 198 New Home Page Image
11-14-2012, 12:02 PM
Originally Posted by tpalelena View Post
I do get it that her gun looks a bit odd, perhaps another type of pistol would have been a better idea.
Well, it's less her phaser looks weird than she's not even looking at whatever she's shooting.

I'm just gonna say, this picture is quite indicative of how seriously Cryptic takes Star Trek. At least we've lost all delusions of class here.

Last edited by thratch1; 11-14-2012 at 12:29 PM.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,926
# 199
11-14-2012, 12:12 PM
I'll miss the retro Mr Handsome, but I think this new vulcan girl is just looking adorable.

Whoever did the artwork, it was done well.

Except for one big fault. Her skin tint is reddish, not greenish.
That can be explained by being a human-vulcan hybrid.
Still...adorable? Yes. Vulcan? No, not fully.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,272
# 200
11-14-2012, 12:21 PM
She's a faerie. See how she is flying?
STO Forum member since before February 2010.
STO Academy's excellent skill planner here: Link
I actually avoid success entirely. It doesn't get me what I want, and the consequences for failure are slim. -- markhawman

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 AM.