Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,738
# 41
11-25-2012, 10:37 PM
My thoughts are these

The cryptic holy trinity I'n this game is a failure
They know it

We have escorts upon escorts, many new science
Choices

Cryptic knows pvp is a finical unbalanced failure
I'n There game

The one thing we don't have is a cruiser with
Teeth a battleship

We have thousands of cruiser players wanting a
Tactical cruiser

If they want to make money that's what it will be
If it's another Eng cruiser sales will be avg/poor to
What they could be a vanity ship like the galaxy

This would out sell any other c-store ship I bet

A cruiser with escort firepower
Escort healing limited engineering
Slow like a cruiser turn like a cruiser
Lots of armor and resistances

It's what isn't I'n the game
And what a LOT of people want

And yes I'm running 3 escorts and no a ship like
That doesn't threaten me
Jellico....Engineer.....Stargazer KDF Tac
Saphire.. Science.....Ko'el Rom Kdf Tac
Leva........Tactical.....Mailu KDF Sci

JJ-Verse will never be Canon or considered Lore...It will always be JJ-Verse
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 165
# 42
11-26-2012, 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterde3 View Post
When Cryptic and CBS held the "Design the next Enterprise" contest CBS made it clear that as a ship that held the name U.S.S. Enterprise, it must be a cruiser.
This would also apply to the Ambassador class so she can't be a destroyer.
Uh didnt the NX 01 was a Tactical ship not a cruiser??????
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 670
# 43
11-26-2012, 01:56 PM
I could see the Ambassador being the first Cruiser with a dedicated LTC Sci station, with more shielding then the Galaxy and more Hull then the Nebula, and manuverability somewhere between, without being too extreme.
Constant exposure to the same opinions leads to continual reinforcement of ideas until eventually, any challenge, no matter what form it takes, is going to be met with a disproportionate sense of outrage. Room for reasoned discussion can no longer occur.

Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,038
# 44
11-27-2012, 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uss917019 View Post
Uh didnt the NX 01 was a Tactical ship not a cruiser??????
That's right, but you missed something:

CBS said "U.S.S. Enteprise", like I wrote in the post you quoted.
The NX-01 was not called "U.S.S. Enteprise", only "Enterprise".
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,294
# 45
11-27-2012, 05:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by azyurion View Post
Well, given that they've hinted at its release before season 8, we should be seeing a lot of them cruising the space lanes sooner than later. The only caveat is that if they make it a "free" ship, it will likely suck itself into immediate obsolescence.
Agreed - if the free ship IS the Ambassador, the fact that it's free tends to suggest that it won't be anything that is going to threaten existing C-store or Fleet ships.

Though, as already suggested, it could lend itself to a future fleet version...

STAR TREK BATTLES - HIGH DPS PLAYERS NEED NOT APPY
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:29 AM.