# 11
12-05-2012, 04:52 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by weylandjuarez
Finally a proper use for those Latinum Holo-Emitters
 |
The Sar Theln Warship looks better, but it should be built like a flight-deck cruiser.
Three years and still no Captain Klaa hair...
# 12
12-05-2012, 05:10 PM
Starbase - T5 (M:T5, E:T4, S:T4)
Embassy - T3 (D:T3, R:T3) - Complete
# 13
12-05-2012, 05:11 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by weylandjuarez
Finally a proper use for those Latinum Holo-Emitters
|
A WEEKLY PODCAST
WE TALK ABOUT STORIES
WE TALK ABOUT STORIES
# 14
12-05-2012, 05:46 PM
Last edited by xantris; 12-05-2012 at 05:48 PM.
# 15
12-05-2012, 07:22 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hippiejon
My only question is why anyone needs to "sell" this ship to people.
Sure, it would be nice if it got some bonus from the J'em Set. Sure it would be nice if it had some awesome weapon like quad cannons or something. BUT ... why do they need to "sell" anyone on something they are giving away for free ? Sure, it could be a better ship, but I don't expect them to have to "sell" me on it. They are GIVING it to me. Now personally I think it's an ugly piece of space junk, and will never fly it, except maybe once to test it out and say "OOOO" and "AAAA". But past that, I don't see myself ever flying it. But it is a good ship. With decent stats, and Boff layout. So, I guess in conclusion, I ask if someone walks up to you and says "Here, this is a free thing", is your immediate response "Why would I want your free thing? Maybe you'd better sell me on why I should want this thing you are GIVING to me for FREE. You know, really sell it, make me understand why I want it." ... Because it's Free ! |
# 16
12-05-2012, 07:33 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by xantris
That Breen ship doesn't need any additional sales pitch, it has the perfect PvE BO layout for an escort and a near perfect console layout. I was half hoping the ship was going to suck so I didn't have to log on and so some silly ass race for the next month... Guess not.
|
It is not a weird handle. Am I the only one that saw Automan in the '80s?
# 17
12-05-2012, 07:56 PM
I don't really want that particular ship.
But I'm going to see if I can actually do the race 25 times in twenty-five days.
I may bring out a TAC toon I haven't used in ages to get it.
My SCI toon isn't interested.
But I'm going to see if I can actually do the race 25 times in twenty-five days.
I may bring out a TAC toon I haven't used in ages to get it.
My SCI toon isn't interested.
# 18
12-05-2012, 09:18 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by curs0r
These things are subjective. I couldn't disagree more with that assessment of it. But I will be running the race just for the fun of that. Weird world, ain't it?
|
The only other layout that might be superior is a Lt Cmdr Engineer slot with (2x) Aux to Battery and Technician doffs. I'm sure we'll see that layout in the near future.
Any layout with cannons and a Cmdr & LT tac BO layout is probably going to be a good ship (ie Temporal Destroyer). It's just the right amount of slots to maximize cannons without waste, and pure cannon builds simply outperform anything else.
Your desire of how you may like your ships to fly is subjective, but when it comes down to number crunching, not so much.
Last edited by xantris; 12-05-2012 at 09:43 PM.
# 19
12-05-2012, 09:32 PM
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 AM.