Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 39
# 51
01-30-2013, 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwebranflakes View Post
I've updated the blog to note that the T3 and T5 version of the Kamarag can equip cannons (dual and dual heavy, of course)

Cheers,

Brandon =/\=
It's a shame the Klingons didn't have more of these ships at Narendra III... can't see how an Ambassador class ship with those stats would've been any help at all.... except as a distraction for the Romulan disruptors...
Ghost of Nimbus III. Commander of the R.R.W. Vengeance.
Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 273
# 52
01-30-2013, 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwebranflakes View Post
I've updated the blog to note that the T3 and T5 version of the Kamarag can equip cannons (dual and dual heavy, of course)

Cheers,

Brandon =/\=
woohoo!!! ty cereal
T5 Ship Comparison Spreadsheet
Play my missions on Holodeck!
Return of Ja'Dok Series (6 Part Series)
Enemy of the Exile Series (4 Part Series)
Task Force Ja'Dok Series (3 Part Series)
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 768
# 53
01-30-2013, 01:09 PM
I'm waiting to see what the probable C-Store version(s) look like. There was a comment from DStahl in an interview released yesterday about the Ambassador class having lots of phaser firepower. The free version while decent for what it is, does not seem to support that comment.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 124
# 54
01-30-2013, 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by graleron View Post
It saddens me to see the reactions of a certain element. Their selfish complaints should not overshadow the joy many of us are feeling that Cryptic are finally filling what has long been the most glaring gap in the lineup of iconic vessels this game features.

Selfish complaints? IT'S AND ANOTHER OLD SHIP OUT CLASSING A NEWER SHIP. AGAIN!!

Explain hot the frac the Excelsior and Ambassador can have better stats the the Galaxy. THAT.. is some BS!!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 245
# 55
01-30-2013, 01:13 PM
Useless boats. But thx anyway.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 173
# 56
01-30-2013, 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdax View Post
Selfish complaints? IT'S AND ANOTHER OLD SHIP OUT CLASSING A NEWER SHIP. AGAIN!!

Explain hot the frac the Excelsior and Ambassador can have better stats the the Galaxy. THAT.. is some BS!!
I would suggest that you target your complaints on why the Galaxy is so poorly represented, rather than dumping on the Ambassador.
Ensign
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 17
# 57
01-30-2013, 01:14 PM
Where does 'lots of phaser firepower' come into play on the Ambassador?
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,223
# 58
01-30-2013, 01:16 PM
I'm thinking I just might switch my KDF science officer from the BoP to this one. Cool looking ship.
--------------------------------------

"We are smart." - Grebnedlog

Member of Alliance Central Command/boq botlhra'ghom
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 987
# 59
01-30-2013, 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shield309 View Post
Where does 'lots of phaser firepower' come into play on the Ambassador?
That it can mount on more (rear) weapon than an escort. Cryptic explains things in one fashion, but stats them in another.
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,223
# 60
01-30-2013, 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by toiva View Post
Both of those ships are recent retrofits. Learn to read.
You're wasting your breath on these people.

Most of them seem totally oblivious that militaries refitting old ships with new technology to bring them up to date is a totally normal thing.
--------------------------------------

"We are smart." - Grebnedlog

Member of Alliance Central Command/boq botlhra'ghom
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:04 PM.