Go Back   Star Trek Online > Feedback > PvP Gameplay
Login

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Cryptic Studios Team
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 737
# 11
02-12-2013, 09:49 AM
I'm surprised to see this crowd dwelling on the price instead of the specs. But even so, here's an update I just posted to the original announcement thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...1&postcount=56

Totally my bad.

Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
-=-=-=-=-=-
Jeremy Randall
Cryptic - Systems Design
"Play smart!"
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 12
02-12-2013, 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I'm surprised to see this crowd dwelling on the price instead of the specs. But even so, here's an update I just posted to the original announcement thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...1&postcount=56

Totally my bad.

Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
It's what Galaxy should have been. I like the layout. But out of spite, wont purchase it.

It has rather high hull hps for its turn rate though. I mean 550 hps for +1 turn ? :/

Last edited by dalnar83; 02-12-2013 at 09:57 AM.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 125
# 13
02-12-2013, 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
Now that the price issue is resolved, I'll definitely be moving from my science odyssey to this. More HP, better turn rate, and more consoles to work with (since I won't be running the oddy set anymore). I just need to get 3 more FSMs.

Not thrilled that its a per-character ship, but since I've only got one toon that I fly as a tank I'll stomach it for a change.

The opinions expressed in my posts are not necessarily those of my employer or Subspace Radio.
Don't like that GIGANTIC forum header? Head to bit.ly/NoMoreForumHeader and learn how to get rid of it.
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 853
# 14
02-12-2013, 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I'm surprised to see this crowd dwelling on the price instead of the specs. But even so, here's an update I just posted to the original announcement thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...1&postcount=56

Totally my bad.

Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
When all we can complain about is the price, that probably means the ship is in our collective eyes "balanced".

Although, the major issue now is that there is absolutely no reason to ever take a fleet galaxy class. It's just that bad.
______________________________________________
"Inquisitors? They're sneaky dudes. Useful, yes, even nescessary, but I wouldn't buy a used aircar from any of them."
Science pvp at its best-http://www.youtube.com/user/matteo716
Do you even Science Bro?
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 804
# 15
02-12-2013, 10:07 AM
[quote=virusdancer;8013911]

X, X
X, X

X, X, X, X
X

X, X, X

I want a carrier with those slots. Preferably the Breen Carrier
---------
Like my fanpage!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Capta...32650110151035
Join Date: August 29th 2010
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,402
# 16
02-12-2013, 10:07 AM
just a commander eng on a cruiser is a bad fit, you cant cover your EPtS without using a more valuable station slot, even if you use damage control doffs because you need 2 slots still for 2 different EPtX skills. a universal ensign can at least put you on even footing with the ody.


also, check the dev tracker, bran did a copy paste fail, again, they cost 4 mods not 5 thankfully.
______________________________________
the pvp build and help thread
galaxy class 3 pack proposal common cryptic, the galaxy model prints money at this point, give us a version that isn't so terrible and charge us $50 for it
gateway links -->Norvo Tigan, Telis Latto Ruwon, Sochie Heim
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,210
# 17
02-12-2013, 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I'm surprised to see this crowd dwelling on the price instead of the specs. But even so, here's an update I just posted to the original announcement thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...1&postcount=56

Totally my bad.

Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
Even if it was 5 I wouldn't mind since it has a layout and turning power I wanted to have on bortasqu' so either way its a great ship for the KDF.
[System] [LegacyFloaterMsg] The Klingon Empire has crushed their enemies!
[System] [LegacyFloaterMsg] The Borg have added Starfleet's distinctiveness to their own.
Ensign
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
# 18
02-12-2013, 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalnar83 View Post
It's what Galaxy should have been. I like the layout. But out of spite, wont purchase it.

It has rather high hull hps for its turn rate though. I mean 550 hps for +1 turn ? :/

It's called "someone has Ferengi blood" when selling these ships to the STO community.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,393
# 19
02-12-2013, 10:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I'm surprised to see this crowd dwelling on the price instead of the specs. But even so, here's an update I just posted to the original announcement thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...1&postcount=56

Totally my bad.

Any feedback on the potential performance of this vessel?
Can I have the kamarag skin for my Chel Grett ? It's a much more functional ship for me even without the cloak.
KBF Lord MalaK
Awoken Dead

Proudly inciting forum dissention since the 2013 St. Valentines day FM massacre
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 20
02-12-2013, 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordmalak1 View Post
Can I have the kamarag skin for my Chel Grett ? It's a much more functional ship for me even without the cloak.
Thats good idea ! Can i have Galaxy skin for the ambassador ?
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 PM.