There's a lot of opinions about that... but as for the forums having 'hissing and spitting', that's not unusual in MMO's
Star Trek fans have mixed reactions to the film, for a multitude of reasons, some logical... some not nearly so. Best left at that, but I will tell that those who have a corrosive illogical hatred for this movie (for whatever reason) will always find reasons to dislike everything about it, including the ship.
And some are in denial that it's nothing like what they want... okay, really done now.
I wouldn't mind having the JJprise in-game, personally. If we have the Galaxy-X, which is also from an alternate timeline, why not that one? Plus the JJ movies, like it or not, are canon so they can used with permission... if they ever sort out who'd Cryptic have to talk to for the rights XD
with so many time travels and dimension-travels, i suppose we can do the same with JJ-verse
I'm tired of seeing people use the Galaxy-X being a reason why the JJ ship should be in the game because they are both from Alternate timelines. I think it's time there were finally some distinctions made about this.
Galaxy-X: It is entirely possible that a Galaxy class was redesigned into the Gal-X and highly likely it wasn't even originally the Enterprise. It wouldn't be the first time a ship was pulled from mothballs and pressed back into service during a time of war. By the way for those that haven't bothered to connect the dots, that war was a Federation-Klingon war....sound familiar?
JJ Enterprise: Alternate timeline has NOTHING to do with the JJ Enterprise design. This design is simply a modernization on the original.
The issue has nothing to do with timeline or canon or non-canon or even the age of the ship, it simply boils down to Cryptic and CBS do NOT have the rights to the JJ Enterprise, these rights belong to Paramount. It's been blatantly obvious that Paramount has no interest in anything that would distract from the movies and anything they have direct control over for the time being.