Go Back   Star Trek Online > Feedback > PvP Gameplay
Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 11
04-22-2013, 10:12 PM
Maybe we should blame those Pvers who posteir their "10k dps" threads and showed how easily they kill borgs with their plasma beam sets

As I never used plasma, I generally "do not care". But you have my sympathy.
Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,691
# 12
04-22-2013, 10:17 PM
I love how derailed this topic got -_-

what was meant to be talk about the arc changes ended up being talk about the plasma debuffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I find this line of replies sadly hilarious. We put a lot of work into the massive list of fixes/changes above, and ya'll are hung up on the ability to skip our content. =p
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 13
04-22-2013, 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynder2012 View Post
I love how derailed this topic got -_-

what was meant to be talk about the arc changes ended up being talk about the plasma debuffs
Welcome in PvP forums, I hope you enjoy your stay here, with us strange lunatics.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,339
# 14
04-22-2013, 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynder2012 View Post
I love how derailed this topic got -_-

what was meant to be talk about the arc changes ended up being talk about the plasma debuffs
There's not much one can really say about the arc changes.

Carriers will like it.
The Romulan fatBirds will like it.

Ships that had no issue before with them will have even less of an issue now.

And...that's kind of it, no?

I mean, what else is there?

Even discussing the abilities themselves would be off topic to the arcs...should we start complaining about SNB again?
Vice Admiral Geist, Klingon Science Officer
I.S.S. Arcadia, Mirror Universe Heavy Cruiser Retrofit
Career Officer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 696
# 15
04-22-2013, 10:38 PM
You were the chosen one... *weep*

Who will be the first to post "awesome change, the devs sure know what they are doing, we needed better snb and gravpulse, and simply boosting d'dex base turn would have been stupid anyway"?

I have flown Sci StarCruisers in premade matches (in the days before the jump console). That turnrate (+occasional evasive) was enough to deliver SNBs. That's all I have to say.
http://hilbertguide.com
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,841
# 16
04-22-2013, 10:41 PM
Even I won't defend this one ?

What is the thinking in increasing the arc ?

Perhaps they can't find the code for ship turn rates. lol

The only thing that would make this stupid change compete... would be a buff to DHC and DC Ithink they need the 90 degree now don't they ?
When the messenger comes to appropriate your profits ... kill the messenger.
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,570
# 17
04-22-2013, 11:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antoniosalieri View Post
Even I won't defend this one ?

What is the thinking in increasing the arc ?

Perhaps they can't find the code for ship turn rates. lol

The only thing that would make this stupid change compete... would be a buff to DHC and DC Ithink they need the 90 degree now don't they ?
*quietly sneaks upon Antonio, silently unsheathing my kut'luch* This is for giving them that idea! *to which I plunge the blade deep into his heart*


Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 18
04-22-2013, 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antoniosalieri View Post
Even I won't defend this one ?

What is the thinking in increasing the arc ?

Perhaps they can't find the code for ship turn rates. lol

The only thing that would make this stupid change compete... would be a buff to DHC and DC Ithink they need the 90 degree now don't they ?
I think nerfing DHC/DC bonus dmg for narrow arc is on the schedule
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,841
# 19
04-22-2013, 11:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalnar83 View Post
I think nerfing DHC/DC bonus dmg for narrow arc is on the schedule
This game would be the biggest pile of slope if they nerf dmg to be honest.

Dmg is still weak. lol

Beams need a buff.... as it is.

The best thing Cryptic could do for the game right now.

Return the original designers power drain mechanic.

Beams would be buffed.... Cannons would be nerfed if you where unwilling to dedicate EPS units or run less cannons.
When the messenger comes to appropriate your profits ... kill the messenger.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 20
04-22-2013, 11:50 PM
Well, If you see the pattern, Cryptic always does the opposite. So if beams are WAD...then the logical conclussion is ?
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.