Commander
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 345
# 11
06-05-2014, 07:02 AM
As a spreadhseet guy, and someone who maintaines his own (pretty terrible) sheet on all these ships, this is phenomenal. You've nailed it on the vertical layout; SO easy to comparte Boff layouts in particular. Great work here!!!
Please reconsider ARC. Please make it optional, at the least. PLEASE.
It seems the vast majority of your most active players (forum regulars) hate the idea... and while that's a small subset of the playerbase, I think it's an important constituency.
THE PLAYERS DO NOT WANT THIS.
Captain
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,333
# 12
06-05-2014, 07:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabelgrave View Post
I could rename that sheet to "KDF Raptors, Raiders, and Destroyers" but that gets kinda long.
"KDF tac ships" is more accurate. =)


Helpful Tools: Dictionary.com - Logical fallacies - Random generator - Word generator - Color tool - Extra Credits - List of common English language errors - Big booty tutorial - Also, follow me on Twitter!
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 487
# 13
06-05-2014, 08:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeitis View Post
"KDF tac ships" is more accurate. =)
Aside from the BoPs, the ships are generally more tactically-oriented based on their boff stations, so I'll keep your suggestion in mind the next time I make an upgrade to the spreadsheet. As a Science Officer who uses such ships quite well, however, I won't promise anything.


For the most part, the whole cruiser-escort-science vessel breakup is just so you can compare ships of remotely similar types and functions, not that they actually are in that category. And then there are the warbirds... I still haven't figured out how to break those into smaller categories.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 35
# 14
06-05-2014, 06:36 PM
This is a pretty nifty spreadsheet. I'd like to submit a correction, however: you omit Odyssey Sci Cruiser's Sensor Analysis (this is correctly referenced for the Bortas Command Cruiser). Not a huge deal, but I'm a stickler for comprehensiveness.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 487
# 15
06-05-2014, 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iusasset View Post
This is a pretty nifty spreadsheet. I'd like to submit a correction, however: you omit Odyssey Sci Cruiser's Sensor Analysis (this is correctly referenced for the Bortas Command Cruiser). Not a huge deal, but I'm a stickler for comprehensiveness.
Good catch. It's updated now with V3.1.1. It seems several ships were given Sensor Scan with S9, but I only found a few of them that were changed.
Ensign
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
# 16
06-06-2014, 04:31 PM
Remarkable work! Only think I caught was that the Tactical Odyssey is missing it's +10 to weapons power.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 487
# 17
06-06-2014, 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by manarisama View Post
Remarkable work! Only think I caught was that the Tactical Odyssey is missing it's +10 to weapons power.
Thanks. I'm adding in these minor corrections as they come.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 487
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 487
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 846
# 20
08-28-2014, 04:46 PM
Bloody good!!
Sorry for any strange typos, I'm cursed with this spell check...
JOIN OUR CULT OR DROWN UNDER OUR UNSTOPPABLE WAKE! Children: 190 (more or less)
Jupiter Concept
Quote:
Originally Posted by tacofangs View Post
I find Doom™ posts kind of hilarious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Kay Ash
Give yourself something to work toward - constantly.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 AM.